11-22193357-G-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_213599.3(ANO5):c.-136G>C variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.826 in 151,762 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 52,288 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.83 ( 52288 hom., cov: 29)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.80 ( 439941 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
ANO5
NM_213599.3 5_prime_UTR
NM_213599.3 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.24
Genes affected
ANO5 (HGNC:27337): (anoctamin 5) This gene encodes a member of the anoctamin family of transmembrane proteins. The encoded protein is likely a calcium activated chloride channel. Mutations in this gene have been associated with gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.96).
BP6
Variant 11-22193357-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-22193357-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 140544.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-22193357-G-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.922 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANO5 | NM_213599.3 | c.-136G>C | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/22 | ENST00000324559.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANO5 | ENST00000324559.9 | c.-136G>C | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/22 | 1 | NM_213599.3 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.826 AC: 125232AN: 151640Hom.: 52231 Cov.: 29
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
125232
AN:
151640
Hom.:
Cov.:
29
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR AF: 0.799 AC: 1094554AN: 1370602Hom.: 439941 Cov.: 63 AF XY: 0.799 AC XY: 538657AN XY: 674350
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR
AF:
AC:
1094554
AN:
1370602
Hom.:
Cov.:
63
AF XY:
AC XY:
538657
AN XY:
674350
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.826 AC: 125352AN: 151762Hom.: 52288 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.823 AC XY: 61018AN XY: 74140
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
125352
AN:
151762
Hom.:
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
AC XY:
61018
AN XY:
74140
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 14, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | ANO5 @LOVD | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 12, 2016 | - - |
Miyoshi muscular dystrophy 3 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 14, 2021 | - - |
Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy, recessive Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
ANO5-Related Muscle Diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 14, 2021 | - - |
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2L Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 14, 2021 | - - |
Miyoshi myopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at