11-32387960-G-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2

The NM_024426.6(WT1):c.*1098C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00557 in 232,172 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 17 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0080 ( 17 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

WT1
NM_024426.6 3_prime_UTR

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, single submitter B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.11

Variant links:

Genes affected

WT1 (HGNC:12796): (WT1 transcription factor) This gene encodes a transcription factor that contains four zinc-finger motifs at the C-terminus and a proline/glutamine-rich DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus. It has an essential role in the normal development of the urogenital system, and it is mutated in a small subset of patients with Wilms tumor. This gene exhibits complex tissue-specific and polymorphic imprinting pattern, with biallelic, and monoallelic expression from the maternal and paternal alleles in different tissues. Multiple transcript variants have been described. In several variants, there is evidence for the use of a non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon upstream of, and in-frame with the first AUG. Authors of PMID:7926762 also provide evidence that WT1 mRNA undergoes RNA editing in human and rat, and that this process is tissue-restricted and developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2015]

WT1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.52).

BP6

Variant 11-32387960-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-32387960-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 304375.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00796 (1194/149970) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.028 (1141/40768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0266. There are 17 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 554 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 1194 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
WT1	NM_024426.6 link	c.*1098C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 10 of 10	ENST00000452863.10	NP_077744.4	P19544-7Q6PI38

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
WT1	ENST00000452863 link	c.*1098C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 10 of 10	1	NM_024426.6	ENSP00000415516.5		P19544-7A0A0A0MT54

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00792

AC:

1187

AN:

149852

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0279

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00247

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00323

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000740

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00486

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00122

AC:

100

AN:

82202

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00124

AC XY:

AN XY:

37934

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0213

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00159

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000868

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00176

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00796

AC:

1194

AN:

149970

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00758

AC XY:

554

AN XY:

73060

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0280

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00247

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000740

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00481

Alfa

AF:

0.00622

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00907

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00144

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Meacham syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Nephrotic syndrome, type 4

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Wilms tumor 1

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.52

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.69

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.92

RBP_regulation_power_radar

2.0

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over