11-32388003-A-AACAC
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BS1_SupportingBS2
The NM_024426.6(WT1):c.*1051_*1054dupGTGT variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0097 ( 12 hom., cov: 0)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0086 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
WT1
NM_024426.6 3_prime_UTR
NM_024426.6 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Not classified
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.29
Publications
2 publications found
Genes affected
WT1 (HGNC:12796): (WT1 transcription factor) This gene encodes a transcription factor that contains four zinc-finger motifs at the C-terminus and a proline/glutamine-rich DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus. It has an essential role in the normal development of the urogenital system, and it is mutated in a small subset of patients with Wilms tumor. This gene exhibits complex tissue-specific and polymorphic imprinting pattern, with biallelic, and monoallelic expression from the maternal and paternal alleles in different tissues. Multiple transcript variants have been described. In several variants, there is evidence for the use of a non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon upstream of, and in-frame with the first AUG. Authors of PMID:7926762 also provide evidence that WT1 mRNA undergoes RNA editing in human and rat, and that this process is tissue-restricted and developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2015]
WT1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
- Denys-Drash syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P
- Wilms tumor 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- familial idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Frasier syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00967 (1417/146578) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0134 (883/65912). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0127. There are 12 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 657 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 0. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1417 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WT1 | ENST00000452863.10 | c.*1051_*1054dupGTGT | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 10 of 10 | 1 | NM_024426.6 | ENSP00000415516.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00967 AC: 1416AN: 146462Hom.: 12 Cov.: 0 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1416
AN:
146462
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00864 AC: 713AN: 82480Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00814 AC XY: 310AN XY: 38080 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
713
AN:
82480
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
310
AN XY:
38080
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
3892
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
30
AN:
2502
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
33
AN:
5114
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
69
AN:
11486
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
696
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
16
AN:
750
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
492
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
494
AN:
50750
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
53
AN:
6798
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0.000000), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.294
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
58
116
174
232
290
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00967 AC: 1417AN: 146578Hom.: 12 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00922 AC XY: 657AN XY: 71292 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1417
AN:
146578
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
657
AN XY:
71292
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
104
AN:
40234
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
165
AN:
14718
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
25
AN:
3390
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
4972
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
22
AN:
4562
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
186
AN:
9588
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
288
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
883
AN:
65912
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
27
AN:
2030
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
63
127
190
254
317
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Nephroblastoma Uncertain:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
11p partial monosomy syndrome Uncertain:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Meacham syndrome Uncertain:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Nephrotic syndrome, type 4 Uncertain:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
PhyloP100
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.