11-32388155-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6_ModerateBS1BS2

The NM_024426.6(WT1):​c.*903G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00252 in 233,778 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0035 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00075 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

WT1
NM_024426.6 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, single submitter B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.52

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
WT1 (HGNC:12796): (WT1 transcription factor) This gene encodes a transcription factor that contains four zinc-finger motifs at the C-terminus and a proline/glutamine-rich DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus. It has an essential role in the normal development of the urogenital system, and it is mutated in a small subset of patients with Wilms tumor. This gene exhibits complex tissue-specific and polymorphic imprinting pattern, with biallelic, and monoallelic expression from the maternal and paternal alleles in different tissues. Multiple transcript variants have been described. In several variants, there is evidence for the use of a non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon upstream of, and in-frame with the first AUG. Authors of PMID:7926762 also provide evidence that WT1 mRNA undergoes RNA editing in human and rat, and that this process is tissue-restricted and developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2015]
WT1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Denys-Drash syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P
  • Wilms tumor 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • familial idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Frasier syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.43).
BP6
Variant 11-32388155-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-32388155-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 304384.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00347 (527/152080) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.012 (499/41468). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0112. There are 3 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 247 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 527 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
WT1NM_024426.6 linkc.*903G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 10 of 10 ENST00000452863.10 NP_077744.4 P19544-7Q6PI38

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
WT1ENST00000452863.10 linkc.*903G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 10 of 10 1 NM_024426.6 ENSP00000415516.5 P19544-7A0A0A0MT54

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00347
AC:
528
AN:
151962
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0121
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00384
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000747
AC:
61
AN:
81698
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.000585
AC XY:
22
AN XY:
37628
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0141
AC:
55
AN:
3898
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000400
AC:
1
AN:
2502
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5126
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
11418
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
702
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
518
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
492
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
50256
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000737
AC:
5
AN:
6786
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
9
13
18
22
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00347
AC:
527
AN:
152080
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00332
AC XY:
247
AN XY:
74352
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0120
AC:
499
AN:
41468
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00105
AC:
16
AN:
15274
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000208
AC:
1
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10594
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000441
AC:
3
AN:
67968
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00380
AC:
8
AN:
2104
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
25
50
75
100
125
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00224
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00377
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Meacham syndrome Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Nephrotic syndrome, type 4 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.43
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.69
PhyloP100
1.5
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.0

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs5030325; hg19: chr11-32409701; API