11-32388223-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_024426.6(WT1):​c.*835A>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0235 in 233,784 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 91 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.022 ( 52 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.026 ( 39 hom. )

Consequence

WT1
NM_024426.6 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.313

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
WT1 (HGNC:12796): (WT1 transcription factor) This gene encodes a transcription factor that contains four zinc-finger motifs at the C-terminus and a proline/glutamine-rich DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus. It has an essential role in the normal development of the urogenital system, and it is mutated in a small subset of patients with Wilms tumor. This gene exhibits complex tissue-specific and polymorphic imprinting pattern, with biallelic, and monoallelic expression from the maternal and paternal alleles in different tissues. Multiple transcript variants have been described. In several variants, there is evidence for the use of a non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon upstream of, and in-frame with the first AUG. Authors of PMID:7926762 also provide evidence that WT1 mRNA undergoes RNA editing in human and rat, and that this process is tissue-restricted and developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2015]
WT1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Denys-Drash syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P
  • Wilms tumor 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • familial idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Frasier syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 11-32388223-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-32388223-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 304389.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0223 (3390/152332) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0347 (2359/68034). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0335. There are 52 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 1581 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 3390 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
WT1NM_024426.6 linkc.*835A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 10 of 10 ENST00000452863.10 NP_077744.4 P19544-7Q6PI38

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
WT1ENST00000452863.10 linkc.*835A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 10 of 10 1 NM_024426.6 ENSP00000415516.5 P19544-7A0A0A0MT54

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0223
AC:
3391
AN:
152214
Hom.:
52
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00649
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0340
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0155
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0179
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00538
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0331
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0253
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0347
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0220
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0257
AC:
2095
AN:
81452
Hom.:
39
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.0262
AC XY:
981
AN XY:
37502
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00487
AC:
19
AN:
3900
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0212
AC:
53
AN:
2500
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0213
AC:
109
AN:
5128
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
11398
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00855
AC:
6
AN:
702
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0469
AC:
23
AN:
490
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0122
AC:
6
AN:
492
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0342
AC:
1713
AN:
50066
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0245
AC:
166
AN:
6776
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
127
255
382
510
637
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0223
AC:
3390
AN:
152332
Hom.:
52
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0212
AC XY:
1581
AN XY:
74496
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00647
AC:
269
AN:
41574
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0155
AC:
237
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0179
AC:
62
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00580
AC:
28
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0331
AC:
351
AN:
10616
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0204
AC:
6
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0347
AC:
2359
AN:
68034
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0217
AC:
46
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
162
325
487
650
812
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
46
92
138
184
230
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0309
Hom.:
110
Bravo
AF:
0.0208
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00635
AC:
23
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Meacham syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Nephrotic syndrome, type 4 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
7.5
DANN
Benign
0.65
PhyloP100
0.31
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.0
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs5030322; hg19: chr11-32409769; API