11-32396367-C-T

Position:

chr11-32396367-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM1BP4BP6BS2_Supporting

The NM_024426.6(WT1):c.1154G>A(p.Arg385Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000458 in 1,614,080 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R385L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000047 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

WT1
NM_024426.6 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:3O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.94

Variant links:

Genes affected

WT1 (HGNC:12796): (WT1 transcription factor) This gene encodes a transcription factor that contains four zinc-finger motifs at the C-terminus and a proline/glutamine-rich DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus. It has an essential role in the normal development of the urogenital system, and it is mutated in a small subset of patients with Wilms tumor. This gene exhibits complex tissue-specific and polymorphic imprinting pattern, with biallelic, and monoallelic expression from the maternal and paternal alleles in different tissues. Multiple transcript variants have been described. In several variants, there is evidence for the use of a non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon upstream of, and in-frame with the first AUG. Authors of PMID:7926762 also provide evidence that WT1 mRNA undergoes RNA editing in human and rat, and that this process is tissue-restricted and developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2015]

WT1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

PM1

In a zinc_finger_region C2H2-type 3 (size 22) in uniprot entity WT1_HUMAN there are 24 pathogenic changes around while only 2 benign (92%) in NM_024426.6

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.32873166).

BP6

Variant 11-32396367-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-32396367-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 135455.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {not_provided=1, Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=3, Benign=1}.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 6 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
WT1	NM_024426.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.1154G>A	p.Arg385Gln	missense_variant	7/10	ENST00000452863.10

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
WT1	ENST00000452863.10 linkuse as main transcript	c.1154G>A	p.Arg385Gln	missense_variant	7/10	1	NM_024426.6		P19544-7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

152104

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000966

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000278

AC:

AN:

251392

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000294

AC XY:

AN XY:

135882

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000326

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000465

AC:

AN:

1461858

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000426

AC XY:

AN XY:

727234

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00136

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000899

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000331

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

152222

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000403

AC XY:

AN XY:

74422

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000968

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Bravo

AF:

0.0000189

ExAC

AF:

0.0000494

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:3Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1Other:1

not provided, no classification provided	reference population	ITMI	Sep 19, 2013	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine	Mar 31, 2016	Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Reported in 1 individual who did not have WT; ExAC: 5/8646 East Asian -

11p partial monosomy syndrome;C0950121:Drash syndrome;C0950122:Frasier syndrome;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Mar 23, 2022

This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 380 of the WT1 protein (p.Arg380Gln). This variant is present in population databases (rs147241955, gnomAD 0.04%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with end-stage renal failure (PMID: 10603123). This variant is also known as c.953G>A (p.Arg312Gln). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 135455). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be disruptive. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may create or strengthen a splice site. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Drash syndrome

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Baylor Genetics

May 05, 2023

- -

Meacham syndrome

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 27, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Nephrotic syndrome, type 4

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 27, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Wilms tumor 1

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 27, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

0.0014

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.080

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.78

.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;D

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.70

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.74

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.94

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.96

D;.;D;.;.;.;.;.;.

M_CAP

Benign

0.040

MetaRNN

Benign

0.22

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.33

MutationTaster

Benign

1.0

D;D

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.64

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.9

N;N;N;N;N;.;.;.;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.55

Sift

Uncertain

0.029

D;D;D;D;D;.;.;.;D

Sift4G

Benign

0.072

T;D;T;D;D;.;.;.;D

Polyphen

0.94

P;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.36

MVP

0.92

ClinPred

0.50

GERP RS

6.2

gMVP

0.62

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over