11-32396367-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4BP6BS2_Supporting

The NM_024426.6(WT1):c.1154G>A(p.Arg385Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000458 in 1,614,080 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R385W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000047 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

WT1
NM_024426.6 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:4O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.94

Publications

5 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

WT1 (HGNC:12796): (WT1 transcription factor) This gene encodes a transcription factor that contains four zinc-finger motifs at the C-terminus and a proline/glutamine-rich DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus. It has an essential role in the normal development of the urogenital system, and it is mutated in a small subset of patients with Wilms tumor. This gene exhibits complex tissue-specific and polymorphic imprinting pattern, with biallelic, and monoallelic expression from the maternal and paternal alleles in different tissues. Multiple transcript variants have been described. In several variants, there is evidence for the use of a non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon upstream of, and in-frame with the first AUG. Authors of PMID:7926762 also provide evidence that WT1 mRNA undergoes RNA editing in human and rat, and that this process is tissue-restricted and developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2015]

WT1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Denys-Drash syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P
Wilms tumor 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, G2P
familial idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Frasier syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

WT1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.32873166).

BP6

Variant 11-32396367-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-32396367-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 135455.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 6 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_024426.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
WT1	NM_024426.6	MANE Select	c.1154G>A	p.Arg385Gln	missense	Exon 7 of 10	NP_077744.4
WT1	NM_024424.5		c.1154G>A	p.Arg385Gln	missense	Exon 7 of 10	NP_077742.3	H0Y7K5
WT1	NM_001407044.1		c.1148G>A	p.Arg383Gln	missense	Exon 7 of 10	NP_001393973.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
WT1	ENST00000452863.10	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.1154G>A	p.Arg385Gln	missense	Exon 7 of 10	ENSP00000415516.5	P19544-7
WT1	ENST00000639563.4	TSL:1	c.1103G>A	p.Arg368Gln	missense	Exon 6 of 9	ENSP00000492269.3	P19544-8
WT1	ENST00000332351.9	TSL:1	c.1103G>A	p.Arg368Gln	missense	Exon 6 of 9	ENSP00000331327.5	J3KNN9

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

152104

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000966

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000278

AC:

AN:

251392

AF XY:

0.0000294

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000326

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000465

AC:

AN:

1461858

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000426

AC XY:

AN XY:

727234

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000224

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00136

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86252

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000187

AC:

AN:

53404

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5756

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000899

AC:

AN:

1112012

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000331

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.495

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

152222

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000403

AC XY:

AN XY:

74422

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000241

AC:

AN:

41534

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15288

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000968

AC:

AN:

5164

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10590

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

292

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68030

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.492

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000271

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000189

ExAC

AF:

0.0000494

AC:

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions

Significance:Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Revision:criteria provided, conflicting classifications

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

11p partial monosomy syndrome;C0950121:Drash syndrome;C0950122:Frasier syndrome;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 (1)

Drash syndrome (1)

Inborn genetic diseases (1)

Meacham syndrome (1)

Mesothelioma, malignant;C0950121:Drash syndrome;C0950122:Frasier syndrome;C1837026:Meacham syndrome;C3151568:Nephrotic syndrome, type 4;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 (1)

Nephrotic syndrome, type 4 (1)

not specified (2)

Wilms tumor 1 (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.19

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

0.0014

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.080

CADD

Pathogenic

(source)

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.78

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.70

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.74

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.94

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.96

M_CAP

Benign

0.040

MetaRNN

Benign

0.22

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.33

PhyloP100

5.9

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.64

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.9

REVEL

Uncertain

0.55

Sift

Uncertain

0.029

Sift4G

Benign

0.072

Polyphen

0.94

Vest4

0.36

MVP

0.92

ClinPred

0.50

GERP RS

6.2

gMVP

0.62

Mutation Taster

=31/69

disease causing

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over