11-34642667-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_012153.6(EHF):c.37C>T(p.Pro13Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000496 in 1,613,890 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P13A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_012153.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_012153.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EHF | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.37C>T | p.Pro13Ser | missense | Exon 2 of 9 | ENSP00000257831.3 | Q9NZC4-1 | ||
| EHF | TSL:1 | c.103C>T | p.Pro35Ser | missense | Exon 2 of 9 | ENSP00000435835.1 | Q9NZC4-3 | ||
| EHF | TSL:1 | c.37C>T | p.Pro13Ser | missense | Exon 2 of 9 | ENSP00000433508.1 | Q9NZC4-1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152094Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000410 AC: 6AN: 1461796Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 727202 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152094Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74282 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at