11-46857538-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2
The NM_002334.4(LRP4):c.*1445A>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.012 in 152,050 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 21 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.012 ( 21 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
LRP4
NM_002334.4 3_prime_UTR
NM_002334.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.0830
Genes affected
LRP4 (HGNC:6696): (LDL receptor related protein 4) This gene encodes a member of the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein family. The encoded protein may be a regulator of Wnt signaling. Mutations in this gene are associated with Cenani-Lenz syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, May 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.78).
BP6
Variant 11-46857538-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-46857538-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 879793.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.012 (1817/152050) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.015 (622/41354). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0141. There are 21 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 898 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 21 SD gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRP4 | NM_002334.4 | c.*1445A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 38/38 | ENST00000378623.6 | ||
LRP4-AS1 | NR_038909.1 | n.197+10821T>C | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRP4 | ENST00000378623.6 | c.*1445A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 38/38 | 1 | NM_002334.4 | P1 | ||
LRP4-AS1 | ENST00000502049.3 | n.192+10821T>C | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 2 | |||||
LRP4 | ENST00000529604.1 | n.2106A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/2 | 2 | ||||
LRP4-AS1 | ENST00000531719.5 | n.291+4592T>C | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0119 AC: 1809AN: 151932Hom.: 21 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1809
AN:
151932
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 30Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 28
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
30
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
28
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0120 AC: 1817AN: 152050Hom.: 21 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0121 AC XY: 898AN XY: 74342
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1817
AN:
152050
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
898
AN XY:
74342
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
12
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Cenani-Lenz syndactyly syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at