11-47442706-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_005055.5(RAPSN):c.640G>A(p.Val214Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000979 in 1,614,262 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005055.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAPSN | NM_005055.5 | c.640G>A | p.Val214Met | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 8 | ENST00000298854.7 | NP_005046.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAPSN | ENST00000298854.7 | c.640G>A | p.Val214Met | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 8 | 1 | NM_005055.5 | ENSP00000298854.2 | ||
RAPSN | ENST00000352508.7 | c.640G>A | p.Val214Met | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 6 | 1 | ENSP00000298853.3 | |||
RAPSN | ENST00000529341.1 | c.640G>A | p.Val214Met | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 5 | 1 | ENSP00000431732.1 | |||
RAPSN | ENST00000524487.5 | c.532-785G>A | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 6 | 5 | ENSP00000435551.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000105 AC: 16AN: 152258Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000267 AC: 67AN: 251224Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000214 AC XY: 29AN XY: 135816
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000971 AC: 142AN: 1461886Hom.: 1 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000839 AC XY: 61AN XY: 727242
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000105 AC: 16AN: 152376Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000107 AC XY: 8AN XY: 74514
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Congenital myasthenic syndrome 11 Uncertain:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Fetal akinesia deformation sequence 1 Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
RAPSN-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Fetal akinesia deformation sequence 1;C4225367:Congenital myasthenic syndrome 11 Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at