Variant 11-57597645-C-G details in Genebe, Genetics Data Aggregator

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2

The ENST00000619430.2(SERPING1):c.-100C>G variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00317 in 152,202 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0032 ( 5 hom., cov: 30)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )

Failed GnomAD Quality Control

Consequence

SERPING1
ENST00000619430.2 5_prime_UTR

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.00900

Variant links:

Genes affected

SERPING1 (HGNC:1228): (serpin family G member 1) This gene encodes a highly glycosylated plasma protein involved in the regulation of the complement cascade. Its encoded protein, C1 inhibitor, inhibits activated C1r and C1s of the first complement component and thus regulates complement activation. It is synthesized in the liver, and its deficiency is associated with hereditary angioneurotic oedema (HANE). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding the same isoform. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

SERPING1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.78).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00317 (482/152202) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00212 (144/68014). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00184. There are 5 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 337 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 30. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
SERPING1	NM_000062.3 linkuse as main transcript			upstream_gene_variant		ENST00000278407.9

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
SERPING1	ENST00000278407.9 linkuse as main transcript			upstream_gene_variant		1	NM_000062.3	P2	P05155-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00317

AC:

482

AN:

152084

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000338

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000393

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0298

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00212

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000958

GnomAD4 exome

Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

276

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

208

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00317

AC:

482

AN:

152202

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00453

AC XY:

337

AN XY:

74408

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000337

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000392

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.0298

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00212

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000948

Alfa

AF:

0.000849

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00103

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary angioedema type 1

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 28, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

SERPING1-related disorder

Benign:1

Benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Sep 24, 2019

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.78

CADD

Benign

3.3

DANN

Benign

0.73

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over