11-61392608-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001173990.3(TMEM216):c.-24C>G variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00211 in 1,535,420 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 74 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001173990.3 5_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Joubert syndrome 2Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Joubert syndrome with oculorenal defectInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Meckel syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- orofaciodigital syndrome type 6Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMEM216 | NM_001173990.3 | c.-24C>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 5 | ENST00000515837.7 | NP_001167461.1 | ||
TMEM216 | NM_001173991.3 | c.-24C>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 5 | NP_001167462.1 | |||
TMEM216 | NM_016499.6 | c.-221C>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 5 | NP_057583.2 | |||
TMEM216 | NM_001330285.2 | c.-221C>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 5 | NP_001317214.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0112 AC: 1698AN: 152192Hom.: 41 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00264 AC: 355AN: 134376 AF XY: 0.00219 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00111 AC: 1532AN: 1383110Hom.: 33 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000989 AC XY: 675AN XY: 682488 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0112 AC: 1703AN: 152310Hom.: 41 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0107 AC XY: 796AN XY: 74468 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Meckel syndrome, type 2 Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
- -
Joubert syndrome 2 Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at