11-61398269-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points: 1P and 16B. PP3BP6_Very_StrongBA1

The ENST00000334888.10(TMEM216):​c.440G>C​(p.Arg147Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.828 in 1,607,904 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 560,838 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R147M) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.72 ( 43218 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.84 ( 517620 hom. )

Consequence

TMEM216
ENST00000334888.10 missense

Scores

2
6

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.817

Publications

42 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TMEM216 (HGNC:25018): (transmembrane protein 216) This locus encodes a transmembrane domain-containing protein. Mutations at this locus have been associated with Meckel-Gruber Syndrome Type 2, and Joubert Syndrome 2, also known as Cerebello-oculorenal Syndrome 2. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
TMEM216 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Joubert syndrome 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Joubert syndrome with oculorenal defect
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Meckel syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • orofaciodigital syndrome type 6
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points.

PP3
Splicing predictors support a deleterious effect. Scorers claiming Pathogenic: max_spliceai. No scorers claiming Uncertain. No scorers claiming Benign.
BP6
Variant 11-61398269-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-61398269-G-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 126297.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.948 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TMEM216NM_001173990.3 linkc.432-1G>C splice_acceptor_variant, intron_variant Intron 4 of 4 ENST00000515837.7 NP_001167461.1 Q9P0N5-1
TMEM216NM_001173991.3 linkc.440G>C p.Arg147Thr missense_variant Exon 5 of 5 NP_001167462.1 Q9P0N5-3
TMEM216NM_016499.6 linkc.257G>C p.Arg86Thr missense_variant Exon 5 of 5 NP_057583.2 Q9P0N5-2
TMEM216NM_001330285.2 linkc.249-1G>C splice_acceptor_variant, intron_variant Intron 4 of 4 NP_001317214.1 Q9P0N5J3QT25

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TMEM216ENST00000334888.10 linkc.440G>C p.Arg147Thr missense_variant Exon 5 of 5 2 ENSP00000334844.5 Q9P0N5-3
TMEM216ENST00000515837.7 linkc.432-1G>C splice_acceptor_variant, intron_variant Intron 4 of 4 2 NM_001173990.3 ENSP00000440638.1 Q9P0N5-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.722
AC:
109477
AN:
151722
Hom.:
43221
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.367
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.913
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.825
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.891
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.971
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.820
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.883
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.856
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.850
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.771
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.831
AC:
203288
AN:
244770
AF XY:
0.837
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.350
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.862
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.891
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.962
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.877
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.849
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.853
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.839
AC:
1221387
AN:
1456064
Hom.:
517620
Cov.:
46
AF XY:
0.841
AC XY:
608994
AN XY:
724150
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.345
AC:
11527
AN:
33402
American (AMR)
AF:
0.861
AC:
38067
AN:
44192
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.887
AC:
23064
AN:
25998
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.971
AC:
38529
AN:
39662
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.838
AC:
71860
AN:
85732
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.880
AC:
46752
AN:
53152
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.856
AC:
4924
AN:
5752
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.845
AC:
936673
AN:
1107994
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.831
AC:
49991
AN:
60180
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.423
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
9529
19058
28586
38115
47644
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20942
41884
62826
83768
104710
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.721
AC:
109486
AN:
151840
Hom.:
43218
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.728
AC XY:
54023
AN XY:
74212
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.367
AC:
15196
AN:
41428
American (AMR)
AF:
0.825
AC:
12609
AN:
15280
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.891
AC:
3091
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.971
AC:
5019
AN:
5170
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.821
AC:
3937
AN:
4798
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.883
AC:
9305
AN:
10540
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.852
AC:
247
AN:
290
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.850
AC:
57636
AN:
67846
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.765
AC:
1615
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1190
2381
3571
4762
5952
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
810
1620
2430
3240
4050
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.822
Hom.:
11912
Bravo
AF:
0.702
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.392
AC:
1528
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.850
AC:
7072
ExAC
AF:
0.813
AC:
98226
Asia WGS
AF:
0.824
AC:
2866
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Apr 25, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 14, 2025
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: TMEM216 c.432-1G>C is located in the last canonical splice-site and is predicted to affect mRNA splicing resulting in a significantly altered protein due to either exon skipping, shortening, or inclusion of intronic material. Several computational tools predict a significant impact on normal splicing: Three predict the variant abolishes a 3' acceptor site. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.83 in 244770 control chromosomes, suggesting that it is the major allele and therefore benign. The observed variant frequency is approximately 216 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TMEM216 causing Joubert Syndrome 2 phenotype (0.0039). To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.432-1G>C in individuals affected with Joubert Syndrome 2 and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 126297). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 04, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Meckel syndrome, type 2 Benign:2
Jul 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Joubert syndrome 2 Benign:2
Jul 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Joubert syndrome Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Joubert syndrome 1 Benign:1
May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.12
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.23
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.14
CADD
Benign
23
DANN
Benign
0.96
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.83
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.66
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.69
D
PhyloP100
0.82
ClinPred
0.018
T
GERP RS
4.1
Mutation Taster
=66/34
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.79
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_AG_spliceai
0.24
Position offset: 15
DS_AL_spliceai
0.79
Position offset: 1

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs10897158; hg19: chr11-61165741; COSMIC: COSV58426369; COSMIC: COSV58426369; API