11-6260037-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2
The NM_176875.4(CCKBR):c.109C>T(p.Leu37Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000429 in 1,598,122 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_176875.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCKBR | NM_176875.4 | c.109C>T | p.Leu37Phe | missense_variant | 1/5 | ENST00000334619.7 | |
CCKBR | NM_001363552.2 | c.109C>T | p.Leu37Phe | missense_variant | 1/4 | ||
CCKBR | NM_001318029.2 | c.109C>T | p.Leu37Phe | missense_variant | 1/4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCKBR | ENST00000334619.7 | c.109C>T | p.Leu37Phe | missense_variant | 1/5 | 1 | NM_176875.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000335 AC: 51AN: 152044Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000452 AC: 103AN: 228104Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000470 AC XY: 59AN XY: 125612
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000439 AC: 635AN: 1445960Hom.: 8 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000442 AC XY: 318AN XY: 719354
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000335 AC: 51AN: 152162Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000350 AC XY: 26AN XY: 74388
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Sep 19, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at