11-64651496-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_015080.4(NRXN2):c.2677A>G(p.Met893Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000496 in 1,613,990 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M893L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_015080.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NRXN2 | ENST00000265459.11 | c.2677A>G | p.Met893Val | missense_variant | Exon 14 of 23 | 5 | NM_015080.4 | ENSP00000265459.5 | ||
| NRXN2 | ENST00000704782.1 | c.2686A>G | p.Met896Val | missense_variant | Exon 13 of 22 | ENSP00000516031.1 | ||||
| NRXN2 | ENST00000704781.1 | c.2686A>G | p.Met896Val | missense_variant | Exon 13 of 22 | ENSP00000516029.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152120Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251340 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000410 AC: 6AN: 1461870Hom.: 0 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 727234 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152120Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74312 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
- -
not provided Uncertain:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at