11-64804758-G-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 1P and 13B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001370259.2(MEN1):c.1409C>T(p.Pro470Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000182 in 1,596,916 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00019 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

MEN1
NM_001370259.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.62

Variant links:

Genes affected

MEN1 (HGNC:7010): (menin 1) This gene encodes menin, a tumor suppressor associated with a syndrome known as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Menin is a scaffold protein that functions in histone modification and epigenetic gene regulation. It is thought to regulate several pathways and processes by altering chromatin structure through the modification of histones. [provided by RefSeq, May 2019]

MEN1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

PP2

Missense variant in the MEN1 gene, where missense mutations are typically associated with disease (based on misZ statistic). The gene has 113 curated pathogenic missense variants (we use a threshold of 10). The gene has 20 curated benign missense variants. Trascript score misZ: 4.1921 (above the threshold of 3.09). GenCC associations: The gene is linked to multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, pituitary gigantism, familial isolated hyperparathyroidism.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009199411).

BP6

Variant 11-64804758-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-64804758-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 188099.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=2}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000112 (17/152182) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00105 (16/15282). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000656. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 8 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 17 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MEN1	NM_001370259.2 link	c.1409C>T	p.Pro470Leu	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 10	ENST00000450708.7	NP_001357188.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MEN1	ENST00000450708.7 link	c.1409C>T	p.Pro470Leu	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 10	5	NM_001370259.2	ENSP00000394933.3		O00255-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

152182

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00105

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00105

AC:

237

AN:

224912

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000782

AC XY:

AN XY:

125296

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00682

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000698

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000190

AC:

274

AN:

1444734

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000163

AC XY:

117

AN XY:

718988

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00565

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000135

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000998

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

152182

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000108

AC XY:

AN XY:

74328

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00105

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000174

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000412

ExAC

AF:

0.000772

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 1

Uncertain:1Benign:4

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 17, 2023

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -

Jun 07, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Dec 23, 2015

Counsyl

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2016

Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:4

Oct 25, 2017

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Dec 22, 2016

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 23, 2022

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 30, 2020

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Jan 21, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Apr 12, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Hyperparathyroidism

Uncertain:1

Jun 07, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.066

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.29

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.18

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.29

T;.;.;.;.;D;D;D;D

Eigen

Benign

-0.54

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.41

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.53

LIST_S2

Benign

0.82

T;T;.;.;T;.;.;T;.

M_CAP

Pathogenic

0.78

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0092

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.75

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.0

.;.;.;.;.;L;L;L;L

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.65

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.0

N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.43

Sift

Benign

0.53

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.34

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.0, 0.0010

.;B;B;B;B;B;B;B;B

Vest4

0.13

MutPred

0.40

.;.;.;.;.;Gain of helix (P = 0.0022);Gain of helix (P = 0.0022);Gain of helix (P = 0.0022);Gain of helix (P = 0.0022);

MVP

0.56

MPC

1.4

ClinPred

0.032

GERP RS

2.5

Varity_R

0.050

gMVP

0.62

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over