11-64807569-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points: 7P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP2
The NM_001370259.2(MEN1):c.766C>G(p.Leu256Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L256F) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001370259.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
- familial isolated hyperparathyroidismInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- pituitary gigantismInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- hereditary pheochromocytoma-paragangliomaInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001370259.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEN1 | NM_001370259.2 | MANE Select | c.766C>G | p.Leu256Val | missense | Exon 4 of 10 | NP_001357188.2 | ||
| MEN1 | NM_001407150.1 | c.781C>G | p.Leu261Val | missense | Exon 4 of 11 | NP_001394079.1 | |||
| MEN1 | NM_001370251.2 | c.766C>G | p.Leu256Val | missense | Exon 4 of 11 | NP_001357180.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEN1 | ENST00000450708.7 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.766C>G | p.Leu256Val | missense | Exon 4 of 10 | ENSP00000394933.3 | ||
| MEN1 | ENST00000312049.11 | TSL:1 | c.766C>G | p.Leu256Val | missense | Exon 4 of 10 | ENSP00000308975.6 | ||
| MEN1 | ENST00000424912.2 | TSL:1 | c.766C>G | p.Leu256Val | missense | Exon 5 of 11 | ENSP00000388016.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 1 Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with valine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 256 of the MEN1 protein (p.Leu256Val). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with MEN1-related conditions. Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) has been performed at Invitae for this missense variant, however the output from this modeling did not meet the statistical confidence thresholds required to predict the impact of this variant on MEN1 protein function. This variant disrupts the p.Leu256 amino acid residue in MEN1. Other variant(s) that disrupt this residue have been determined to be pathogenic (PMID: 9792884; Invitae). This suggests that this residue is clinically significant, and that variants that disrupt this residue are likely to be disease-causing. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
The p.L256V variant (also known as c.766C>G), located in coding exon 3 of the MEN1 gene, results from a C to G substitution at nucleotide position 766. The leucine at codon 256 is replaced by valine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is conserved. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at