11-64809874-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points: 7P and 0B. PM2PP2PP3_Strong
The NM_001370259.2(MEN1):c.236C>G(p.Pro79Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000206 in 1,453,918 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P79S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001370259.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
- familial isolated hyperparathyroidismInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- pituitary gigantismInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- hereditary pheochromocytoma-paragangliomaInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001370259.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEN1 | NM_001370259.2 | MANE Select | c.236C>G | p.Pro79Arg | missense | Exon 2 of 10 | NP_001357188.2 | ||
| MEN1 | NM_001407150.1 | c.236C>G | p.Pro79Arg | missense | Exon 2 of 11 | NP_001394079.1 | |||
| MEN1 | NM_001370251.2 | c.236C>G | p.Pro79Arg | missense | Exon 2 of 11 | NP_001357180.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEN1 | ENST00000450708.7 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.236C>G | p.Pro79Arg | missense | Exon 2 of 10 | ENSP00000394933.3 | ||
| MEN1 | ENST00000312049.11 | TSL:1 | c.236C>G | p.Pro79Arg | missense | Exon 2 of 10 | ENSP00000308975.6 | ||
| MEN1 | ENST00000424912.2 | TSL:1 | c.236C>G | p.Pro79Arg | missense | Exon 3 of 11 | ENSP00000388016.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000206 AC: 3AN: 1453918Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000415 AC XY: 3AN XY: 722756 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 30
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 1 Uncertain:2
This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with arginine, which is basic and polar, at codon 79 of the MEN1 protein (p.Pro79Arg). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer (PMID: 35264596). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 527276). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt MEN1 protein function with a positive predictive value of 95%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
not provided Uncertain:1
Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Identified in an individual with breast cancer (Guindalini et al., 2022); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 35264596)
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at