11-65557854-CCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAG-CCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAG

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP3BP6BS1BS2

The NM_001130144.3(LTBP3):​c.97_105dupCTGCTGCTG​(p.Leu33_Leu35dup) variant causes a conservative inframe insertion change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00289 in 1,320,230 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0023 ( 0 hom., cov: 27)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0030 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

LTBP3
NM_001130144.3 conservative_inframe_insertion

Scores

Not classified

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.342

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
LTBP3 (HGNC:6716): (latent transforming growth factor beta binding protein 3) The protein encoded by this gene forms a complex with transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) proteins and may be involved in their subcellular localization. Activation of this complex requires removal of the encoded binding protein. This protein also may play a structural role in the extracellular matrix. Three transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Jan 2010]
LTBP3 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • brachyolmia-amelogenesis imperfecta syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
  • geleophysic dysplasia 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • Acromicric dysplasia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • geleophysic dysplasia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.

BP3
Nonframeshift variant in repetitive region in NM_001130144.3
BP6
Variant 11-65557854-C-CCAGCAGCAG is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-65557854-C-CCAGCAGCAG is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 464029.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00227 (339/149252) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00347 (232/66922). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0031. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 151 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 27. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 8 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
LTBP3NM_001130144.3 linkc.97_105dupCTGCTGCTG p.Leu33_Leu35dup conservative_inframe_insertion Exon 1 of 28 ENST00000301873.11 NP_001123616.1 Q9NS15-1Q8WYU6
LTBP3NM_021070.4 linkc.97_105dupCTGCTGCTG p.Leu33_Leu35dup conservative_inframe_insertion Exon 1 of 27 NP_066548.2 Q9NS15-2Q8WYU6
LTBP3NM_001164266.1 linkc.-251_-243dupCTGCTGCTG 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 27 NP_001157738.1 Q9NS15B9EG76Q8WYU6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
LTBP3ENST00000301873.11 linkc.97_105dupCTGCTGCTG p.Leu33_Leu35dup conservative_inframe_insertion Exon 1 of 28 2 NM_001130144.3 ENSP00000301873.5 Q9NS15-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00227
AC:
339
AN:
149162
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
27
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000929
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00260
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00467
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000195
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00167
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000206
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00325
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00347
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000982
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00182
AC:
60
AN:
33030
AF XY:
0.00172
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00608
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00216
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00293
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00297
AC:
3478
AN:
1170978
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
26
AF XY:
0.00294
AC XY:
1682
AN XY:
572164
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000751
AC:
18
AN:
23980
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00375
AC:
72
AN:
19206
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00593
AC:
105
AN:
17700
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00102
AC:
26
AN:
25430
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00129
AC:
62
AN:
48006
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000303
AC:
8
AN:
26434
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00471
AC:
18
AN:
3820
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00317
AC:
3039
AN:
959530
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00277
AC:
130
AN:
46872
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.462
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
128
256
385
513
641
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
130
260
390
520
650
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00227
AC:
339
AN:
149252
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
27
AF XY:
0.00207
AC XY:
151
AN XY:
72844
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000926
AC:
38
AN:
41032
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00259
AC:
39
AN:
15046
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00467
AC:
16
AN:
3424
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000196
AC:
1
AN:
5110
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00167
AC:
8
AN:
4782
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000206
AC:
2
AN:
9686
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00350
AC:
1
AN:
286
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00347
AC:
232
AN:
66922
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000973
AC:
2
AN:
2056
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.495
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
17
35
52
70
87
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000274
Hom.:
40

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Uncertain:1
Jan 01, 2019
Genomic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Brachyolmia-amelogenesis imperfecta syndrome;C4540511:Geleophysic dysplasia 3 Uncertain:1
Jan 18, 2023
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Brachyolmia-amelogenesis imperfecta syndrome Benign:1
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

LTBP3-related disorder Benign:1
Nov 19, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
PhyloP100
0.34
Mutation Taster
=84/16
polymorphism

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs71036212; hg19: chr11-65325325; API