11-65867920-CG-CGG
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 12 ACMG points: 12P and 0B. PVS1PM2PP5_Moderate
The NM_016938.5(EFEMP2):c.1110dupC(p.Gly371ArgfsTer20) variant causes a frameshift change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P370P) has been classified as Likely benign. Variant results in nonsense mediated mRNA decay.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016938.5 frameshift
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- cutis laxa, autosomal recessive, type 1BInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, G2P
- autosomal recessive cutis laxa type 1Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- lethal arteriopathy syndrome due to fibulin-4 deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- thoracic aortic aneurysmInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_016938.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFEMP2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1110dupC | p.Gly371ArgfsTer20 | frameshift | Exon 10 of 11 | ENSP00000309953.6 | O95967 | ||
| EFEMP2 | TSL:1 | n.1110dupC | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 10 of 12 | ENSP00000435295.1 | O95967 | |||
| EFEMP2 | c.1329dupC | p.Gly444ArgfsTer20 | frameshift | Exon 11 of 12 | ENSP00000577986.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at