11-65867936-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_016938.5(EFEMP2):c.1095G>A(p.Ala365Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000161 in 1,613,964 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00015 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00016 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

EFEMP2
NM_016938.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.00600

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

EFEMP2 (HGNC:3219): (EGF containing fibulin extracellular matrix protein 2) A large number of extracellular matrix proteins have been found to contain variations of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) domain and have been implicated in functions as diverse as blood coagulation, activation of complement and determination of cell fate during development. The protein encoded by this gene contains four EGF2 domains and six calcium-binding EGF2 domains. This gene is necessary for elastic fiber formation and connective tissue development. Defects in this gene are cause of an autosomal recessive cutis laxa syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

EFEMP2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

cutis laxa, autosomal recessive, type 1B
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics
familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection
Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
autosomal recessive cutis laxa type 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
lethal arteriopathy syndrome due to fibulin-4 deficiency
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
thoracic aortic aneurysm
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

EFEMP2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.24).

BP6

Variant 11-65867936-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-65867936-C-T is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 472808.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.006 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
EFEMP2	NM_016938.5 link	c.1095G>A	p.Ala365Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 11	ENST00000307998.11	NP_058634.4	O95967A0A024R5G1Q9H3D5
EFEMP2	NR_037718.2 link	n.1220G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 10 of 12

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
EFEMP2	ENST00000307998.11 link	c.1095G>A	p.Ala365Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 11	1	NM_016938.5	ENSP00000309953.6		O95967

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000151

AC:

AN:

152150

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000323

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000107

AC:

AN:

251444

AF XY:

0.000118

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000109

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000211

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000162

AC:

237

AN:

1461814

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000175

AC XY:

127

AN XY:

727202

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000597

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000252

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53348

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

230

AN:

1112008

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000662

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.480

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000151

AC:

AN:

152150

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000148

AC XY:

AN XY:

74320

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000241

AC:

AN:

41426

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15276

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5180

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4836

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10604

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000323

AC:

AN:

68040

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2088

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.497

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000154

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000151

EpiCase

AF:

0.000436

EpiControl

AF:

0.000356

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cutis laxa, autosomal recessive, type 1B

Benign:2

Feb 11, 2021

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 20, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Oct 19, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Jan 11, 2021

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

May 14, 2020

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

EFEMP2-related disorder

Benign:1

Apr 11, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.24

CADD

Benign

5.3

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.96

PhyloP100

-0.0060

PromoterAI

0.016

Neutral

(source)

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over