11-66510657-A-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is . The variant received -3 classification points (ACMG Germline Pathogenicity v2019): 1P and 4B. PM2_SupportingBP4_Strong

The NM_024649.5(BBS1):c.-3A>G variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a cumulative frequency of 0.0000248 (AC=40) in the gnomAD database across 1,614,116 control chromosomes (no homozygotes observed). The grpmax filtering allele frequency (95% CI) is 0.000378. In-silico predictor (BayesDel (noAF)) classifies this variant as likely benign. Splicing prediction tools (SpliceAI) predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain Significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00016 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000011 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BBS1
NM_024649.5 5_prime_UTR

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:4B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.94

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

BBS1 (HGNC:966): (Bardet-Biedl syndrome 1) Mutations in this gene have been observed in patients with the major form (type 1) of Bardet-Biedl syndrome. The encoded protein may play a role in eye, limb, cardiac and reproductive system development. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

BBS1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, Myriad Women's Health, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
BBS1-related ciliopathy
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Bardet-Biedl syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

BBS1 links:

ENSG00000256349 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000256349 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

new If you want to explore the variant's impact on the transcript NM_024649.5, check out the Mutation Effect Viewer. This is especially useful for frameshift variants or if you want to visualize the effect of exon loss / intron retention.

Classification according to ACMG Germline Pathogenicity v2019

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 points.

PM2

Rare in gnomAD for AR/unknown gene (popmax AF below threshold) — PM2 Supporting; GnomAD popmax AF = 0.000378 — borderline rare for AR gene (base 0.001, raised to 0.00268 by highest known P/LP ClinVar AF 0.00268) — PM2 supporting.

BP4

Computational evidence supports benign — no pathogenic computational or splicing signal (BP4); Splicing verdict: benign (Strong).; Germline computational verdict: benign (Strong).

Variant Effect in Transcripts

Automated classification analysis was done for transcript: NM_024649.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated classification assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Sel.	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	BBS1	NM_024649.5	MANE Select	c.-3A>G		5_prime_UTR	Exon 1 of 17	NP_078925.3

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
BBS1	ENST00000318312.12	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.-3A>G	5_prime_UTR	Exon 1 of 17	ENSP00000317469.7	Q8NFJ9-1
BBS1	ENST00000393994.4	TSL:1	c.-3A>G	5_prime_UTR	Exon 1 of 13	ENSP00000377563.2	Q8NFJ9-3
ENSG00000256349	ENST00000419755.3	TSL:2	c.159-356A>G	intron	N/A	ENSP00000398526.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000158

AC:

AN:

152190

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000555

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000319

AC:

AN:

250670

AF XY:

0.0000221

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000433

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000109

AC:

AN:

1461808

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000138

AC XY:

AN XY:

727198

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000418

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000447

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86254

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53368

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

1111988

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.497

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000158

AC:

AN:

152308

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000107

AC XY:

AN XY:

74474

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000553

AC:

AN:

41570

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15304

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5180

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10616

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68020

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.550

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000165

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000136

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions

Significance:Uncertain significance

Revision:criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 1 (2)

BBS1-related disorder (1)

not provided (1)

not specified (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.53

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.70

PhyloP100

1.9

PromoterAI

-0.82

Under-expression

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

MaxEntScan Visualizer can be used to analyze the impact of this mutation on the neighboring sequence.

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

Classification according to ACMG Germline Pathogenicity v2019

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over