11-66568077-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_003793.4(CTSF):āc.219T>Cā(p.Gly73Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.54 in 1,575,052 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 236,766 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. GQ73GPA?) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003793.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTSF | NM_003793.4 | c.219T>C | p.Gly73Gly | synonymous_variant | 2/13 | ENST00000310325.10 | NP_003784.2 | |
CTSF | XM_011545328.3 | c.39T>C | p.Gly13Gly | synonymous_variant | 2/13 | XP_011543630.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTSF | ENST00000310325.10 | c.219T>C | p.Gly73Gly | synonymous_variant | 2/13 | 1 | NM_003793.4 | ENSP00000310832.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.609 AC: 92428AN: 151892Hom.: 29627 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.468 AC: 89503AN: 191340Hom.: 23907 AF XY: 0.467 AC XY: 49066AN XY: 105016
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.533 AC: 757927AN: 1423048Hom.: 207083 Cov.: 47 AF XY: 0.529 AC XY: 372950AN XY: 705440
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.609 AC: 92530AN: 152004Hom.: 29683 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.604 AC XY: 44878AN XY: 74260
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Oct 22, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 13, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Apr 20, 2017 | - - |
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 13 Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 30, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | Apr 22, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Sep 21, 2015 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Dec 03, 2021 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 08, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at