11-66748457-A-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_024650.4(TOP6BL):c.109A>T(p.Ile37Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000657 in 152,238 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I37V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024650.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- hydatidiform mole, recurrent, 4Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_024650.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOP6BL | TSL:1 | c.-210A>T | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 1 of 15 | ENSP00000434648.2 | A0A140TA08 | |||
| TOP6BL | TSL:2 MANE Select | c.-30+3538A>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000444319.1 | Q8N6T0-6 | |||
| TOP6BL | TSL:2 | c.109A>T | p.Ile37Phe | missense | Exon 2 of 17 | ENSP00000432039.3 | A0A2U3TZP7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152238Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 29
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152238Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74368 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at