11-67490085-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_003977.4(AIP):​c.516C>T​(p.Asp172Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.022 in 1,611,554 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,033 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.033 ( 129 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.021 ( 904 hom. )

Consequence

AIP
NM_003977.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.88

Publications

18 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
AIP (HGNC:358): (aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein) The protein encoded by this gene is a receptor for aryl hydrocarbons and a ligand-activated transcription factor. The encoded protein is found in the cytoplasm as part of a multiprotein complex, but upon binding of ligand is transported to the nucleus. This protein can regulate the expression of many xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes. Also, the encoded protein can bind specifically to and inhibit the activity of hepatitis B virus. Three transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2014]
MIR6752 (HGNC:50020): (microRNA 6752) microRNAs (miRNAs) are short (20-24 nt) non-coding RNAs that are involved in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression in multicellular organisms by affecting both the stability and translation of mRNAs. miRNAs are transcribed by RNA polymerase II as part of capped and polyadenylated primary transcripts (pri-miRNAs) that can be either protein-coding or non-coding. The primary transcript is cleaved by the Drosha ribonuclease III enzyme to produce an approximately 70-nt stem-loop precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA), which is further cleaved by the cytoplasmic Dicer ribonuclease to generate the mature miRNA and antisense miRNA star (miRNA*) products. The mature miRNA is incorporated into a RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), which recognizes target mRNAs through imperfect base pairing with the miRNA and most commonly results in translational inhibition or destabilization of the target mRNA. The RefSeq represents the predicted microRNA stem-loop. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).
BP6
Variant 11-67490085-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-67490085-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 305728.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.88 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.118 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
AIPNM_003977.4 linkc.516C>T p.Asp172Asp synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 6 ENST00000279146.8 NP_003968.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
AIPENST00000279146.8 linkc.516C>T p.Asp172Asp synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 6 1 NM_003977.4 ENSP00000279146.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0325
AC:
4941
AN:
152150
Hom.:
127
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0450
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0245
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0317
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.125
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0366
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0706
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0141
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0288
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0338
AC:
8325
AN:
245994
AF XY:
0.0328
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0454
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0250
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0272
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.123
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0632
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0145
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0274
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0209
AC:
30542
AN:
1459286
Hom.:
904
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0212
AC XY:
15386
AN XY:
725752
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0477
AC:
1596
AN:
33450
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0265
AC:
1180
AN:
44472
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0273
AC:
711
AN:
26090
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.157
AC:
6200
AN:
39616
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0360
AC:
3089
AN:
85910
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0608
AC:
3185
AN:
52394
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0144
AC:
83
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0116
AC:
12887
AN:
1111278
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0267
AC:
1611
AN:
60312
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.478
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1892
3783
5675
7566
9458
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
576
1152
1728
2304
2880
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0325
AC:
4955
AN:
152268
Hom.:
129
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0352
AC XY:
2621
AN XY:
74432
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0451
AC:
1874
AN:
41544
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0245
AC:
375
AN:
15314
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0317
AC:
110
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.126
AC:
653
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0363
AC:
175
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0706
AC:
747
AN:
10588
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0141
AC:
956
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0304
AC:
64
AN:
2106
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.493
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
242
484
725
967
1209
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
60
120
180
240
300
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0209
Hom.:
32
Bravo
AF:
0.0305
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0830
AC:
287
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Jan 10, 2019
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Somatotroph adenoma Benign:2
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Aug 12, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Dec 13, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
CADD
Benign
4.1
DANN
Benign
0.87
PhyloP100
-1.9
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2276020; hg19: chr11-67257556; COSMIC: COSV54159721; COSMIC: COSV54159721; API