11-68937012-G-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7
The NM_002180.3(IGHMBP2):c.2532G>T(p.Ala844=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000196 in 1,608,370 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00015 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00020 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
IGHMBP2
NM_002180.3 synonymous
NM_002180.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.817
Genes affected
IGHMBP2 (HGNC:5542): (immunoglobulin mu DNA binding protein 2) This gene encodes a helicase superfamily member that binds a specific DNA sequence from the immunoglobulin mu chain switch region. Mutations in this gene lead to spinal muscle atrophy with respiratory distress type 1. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 11-68937012-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-68937012-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 305856.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr11-68937012-G-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.817 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGHMBP2 | NM_002180.3 | c.2532G>T | p.Ala844= | synonymous_variant | 13/15 | ENST00000255078.8 | NP_002171.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGHMBP2 | ENST00000255078.8 | c.2532G>T | p.Ala844= | synonymous_variant | 13/15 | 1 | NM_002180.3 | ENSP00000255078 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000151 AC: 23AN: 152230Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
23
AN:
152230
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000149 AC: 35AN: 235328Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000162 AC XY: 21AN XY: 129544
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
35
AN:
235328
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
21
AN XY:
129544
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000201 AC: 293AN: 1456140Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.000190 AC XY: 138AN XY: 724410
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
293
AN:
1456140
Hom.:
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
AC XY:
138
AN XY:
724410
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000151 AC: 23AN: 152230Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000134 AC XY: 10AN XY: 74364
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
23
AN:
152230
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
74364
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Autosomal recessive distal spinal muscular atrophy 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 10, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre | - | - - |
Autosomal recessive distal spinal muscular atrophy 1;C4015349:Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2S Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 21, 2024 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 11, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at