11-72196122-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_016729.3(FOLR1):c.719C>T(p.Ala240Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000198 in 1,614,082 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000099 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00021 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

FOLR1
NM_016729.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.278

Variant links:

Genes affected

FOLR1 (HGNC:3791): (folate receptor alpha) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the folate receptor family. Members of this gene family bind folic acid and its reduced derivatives, and transport 5-methyltetrahydrofolate into cells. This gene product is a secreted protein that either anchors to membranes via a glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol linkage or exists in a soluble form. Mutations in this gene have been associated with neurodegeneration due to cerebral folate transport deficiency. Due to the presence of two promoters, multiple transcription start sites, and alternative splicing, multiple transcript variants encoding the same protein have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

FOLR1 links:

ENSG00000204971 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000204971 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0348773).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000986 (15/152202) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00022 (15/68042). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000135. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 5 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FOLR1	NM_016729.3 link	c.719C>T	p.Ala240Val	missense_variant	Exon 4 of 4	ENST00000393676.5	NP_057941.1	P15328A0A024R5H1
FOLR1	NM_000802.3 link	c.719C>T	p.Ala240Val	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 5		NP_000793.1	P15328A0A024R5H1
FOLR1	NM_016724.3 link	c.719C>T	p.Ala240Val	missense_variant	Exon 6 of 6		NP_057936.1	P15328A0A024R5H1
FOLR1	NM_016725.3 link	c.719C>T	p.Ala240Val	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 5		NP_057937.1	P15328A0A024R5H1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
FOLR1	ENST00000393676.5 link	c.719C>T	p.Ala240Val	missense_variant	Exon 4 of 4	1	NM_016729.3	ENSP00000377281.3		P15328

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000986

AC:

AN:

152202

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000220

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000163

AC:

AN:

251328

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000147

AC XY:

AN XY:

135834

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000867

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000317

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000209

AC:

305

AN:

1461880

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000208

AC XY:

151

AN XY:

727242

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000447

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000383

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000374

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000263

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000993

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000986

AC:

AN:

152202

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000672

AC XY:

AN XY:

74360

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000220

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000179

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000982

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000270

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000233

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000165

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000218

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cerebral folate transport deficiency

Uncertain:3

Apr 10, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 17, 2022

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, with valine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 240 of the FOLR1 protein (p.Ala240Val). This variant is present in population databases (rs147155003, gnomAD 0.03%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with FOLR1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 197830). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Not Available"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0"). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Jan 15, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided

Uncertain:2

Apr 08, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 03, 2023

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Dec 14, 2022

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.084

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.45

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.57

CADD

Benign

2.0

DANN

Benign

0.70

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.12

T;T;T;T

Eigen

Benign

-1.5

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.5

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.051

LIST_S2

Benign

0.50

.;.;.;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.013

MetaRNN

Benign

0.035

T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

-0.090

N;N;N;N

PrimateAI

Benign

0.30

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.43

N;N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.093

Sift

Benign

0.34

T;T;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.28

T;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.0

B;B;B;B

Vest4

0.15

MVP

0.30

MPC

0.40

ClinPred

0.036

GERP RS

-1.0

Varity_R

0.027

gMVP

0.52

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over