11-77147791-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):​c.133-7C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00649 in 1,609,244 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 48 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0044 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0067 ( 45 hom. )

Consequence

MYO7A
NM_000260.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00006355
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.724

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO7A (HGNC:7606): (myosin VIIA) This gene is a member of the myosin gene family. Myosins are mechanochemical proteins characterized by the presence of a motor domain, an actin-binding domain, a neck domain that interacts with other proteins, and a tail domain that serves as an anchor. This gene encodes an unconventional myosin with a very short tail. Defects in this gene are associated with the mouse shaker-1 phenotype and the human Usher syndrome 1B which are characterized by deafness, reduced vestibular function, and (in human) retinal degeneration. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
MYO7A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, G2P
  • Usher syndrome type 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, PanelApp Australia
  • Usher syndrome type 1B
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Usher syndrome type 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.68).
BP6
Variant 11-77147791-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-77147791-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 43141.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00442 (673/152336) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00723 (492/68022). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0067. There are 3 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 302 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYO7ANM_000260.4 linkc.133-7C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 3 of 48 ENST00000409709.9 NP_000251.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYO7AENST00000409709.9 linkc.133-7C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 3 of 48 1 NM_000260.4 ENSP00000386331.3
MYO7AENST00000458637.6 linkc.133-7C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 3 of 48 1 ENSP00000392185.2
MYO7AENST00000409619.6 linkc.100-7C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 4 of 49 1 ENSP00000386635.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00442
AC:
673
AN:
152218
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00171
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00281
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00374
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00228
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00329
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00723
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00383
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00484
AC:
1161
AN:
239646
AF XY:
0.00486
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000861
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00292
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00556
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000565
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00509
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00764
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00579
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00671
AC:
9773
AN:
1456908
Hom.:
45
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00651
AC XY:
4717
AN XY:
724122
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000958
AC:
32
AN:
33388
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00341
AC:
151
AN:
44294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00494
AC:
128
AN:
25900
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000253
AC:
1
AN:
39596
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00118
AC:
100
AN:
84836
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00539
AC:
282
AN:
52300
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000868
AC:
5
AN:
5760
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00787
AC:
8744
AN:
1110590
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00548
AC:
330
AN:
60244
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.487
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
554
1107
1661
2214
2768
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
318
636
954
1272
1590
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00442
AC:
673
AN:
152336
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00405
AC XY:
302
AN XY:
74488
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00171
AC:
71
AN:
41580
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00281
AC:
43
AN:
15310
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00374
AC:
13
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00228
AC:
11
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00329
AC:
35
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00723
AC:
492
AN:
68022
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00379
AC:
8
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
39
77
116
154
193
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00493
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00449
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
Jan 23, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 31, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

MYO7A: BP4, BS2 -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 11, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:4
Sep 29, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 13, 2010
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This c.133-7C>T variant is not predicted to have clinical significance based on its occurrence at an equal frequency in cases and controls (Weston et al. 1996). -

Jan 24, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Benign:2
Jan 01, 2019
Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Usher syndrome type 1B Benign:1
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.68
CADD
Benign
6.3
DANN
Benign
0.94
PhyloP100
-0.72
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000064
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0020
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs111033221; hg19: chr11-76858837; API