11-77155902-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):​c.286-5C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00275 in 1,584,686 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 91 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.013 ( 48 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0017 ( 43 hom. )

Consequence

MYO7A
NM_000260.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00002144
2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.266
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO7A (HGNC:7606): (myosin VIIA) This gene is a member of the myosin gene family. Myosins are mechanochemical proteins characterized by the presence of a motor domain, an actin-binding domain, a neck domain that interacts with other proteins, and a tail domain that serves as an anchor. This gene encodes an unconventional myosin with a very short tail. Defects in this gene are associated with the mouse shaker-1 phenotype and the human Usher syndrome 1B which are characterized by deafness, reduced vestibular function, and (in human) retinal degeneration. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
BP6
Variant 11-77155902-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-77155902-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 43192.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0131 (1988/152322) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0441 (1832/41552). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0424. There are 48 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 921 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 48 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MYO7ANM_000260.4 linkc.286-5C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant ENST00000409709.9 NP_000251.3 Q13402-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYO7AENST00000409709.9 linkc.286-5C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant 1 NM_000260.4 ENSP00000386331.3 Q13402-1
MYO7AENST00000458637.6 linkc.286-5C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant 1 ENSP00000392185.2 Q13402-2
MYO7AENST00000409619.6 linkc.253-5C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant 1 ENSP00000386635.2 Q13402-8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0130
AC:
1982
AN:
152204
Hom.:
48
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0441
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00379
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0176
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000250
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00910
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00384
AC:
855
AN:
222588
Hom.:
26
AF XY:
0.00276
AC XY:
332
AN XY:
120082
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0455
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00160
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0165
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000364
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000381
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000280
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00126
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00166
AC:
2372
AN:
1432364
Hom.:
43
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00141
AC XY:
1001
AN XY:
708092
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0468
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00187
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0147
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000853
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000108
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00417
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0131
AC:
1988
AN:
152322
Hom.:
48
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0124
AC XY:
921
AN XY:
74488
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0441
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00379
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0176
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000250
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00900
Alfa
AF:
0.00622
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.0145
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00346
AC:
12
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineFeb 20, 2012286-5C>T in intron 5 of MYO7A: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 4.4% (163/3706) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http: //evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs111033471). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 29, 2018This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Usher syndrome type 1B Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.81
CADD
Benign
1.1
DANN
Benign
0.54

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000021
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0020
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs111033471; hg19: chr11-76866948; API