11-77155945-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BA1

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The filtering allele frequency of the p.Tyr108= variant in the MYO7A gene is 1.45% (300/18658) of East Asian chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; calculated by using inverse allele frequency at https://www.cardiodb.org/allelefrequencyapp/), which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel for autosomal dominant hearing loss variants (BA1). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA132282/MONDO:0019497/005

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00039 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00023 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

MYO7A
NM_000260.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.37

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

MYO7A (HGNC:7606): (myosin VIIA) This gene is a member of the myosin gene family. Myosins are mechanochemical proteins characterized by the presence of a motor domain, an actin-binding domain, a neck domain that interacts with other proteins, and a tail domain that serves as an anchor. This gene encodes an unconventional myosin with a very short tail. Defects in this gene are associated with the mouse shaker-1 phenotype and the human Usher syndrome 1B which are characterized by deafness, reduced vestibular function, and (in human) retinal degeneration. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

MYO7A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, G2P
Usher syndrome type 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, PanelApp Australia
Usher syndrome type 1B
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
hearing loss, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Usher syndrome type 2
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

MYO7A links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.

BA1

For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MYO7A	NM_000260.4 link	c.324C>T	p.Tyr108Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 49	ENST00000409709.9	NP_000251.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein
MYO7A	ENST00000409709.9 link	c.324C>T	p.Tyr108Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 49	1	NM_000260.4	ENSP00000386331.3
MYO7A	ENST00000458637.6 link	c.324C>T	p.Tyr108Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 49	1		ENSP00000392185.2
MYO7A	ENST00000409619.6 link	c.291C>T	p.Tyr97Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 50	1		ENSP00000386635.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000401

AC:

AN:

152248

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0113

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00120

AC:

293

AN:

244834

AF XY:

0.00123

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0163

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000335

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000227

AC:

331

AN:

1459070

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000218

AC XY:

158

AN XY:

725448

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33424

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44414

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26064

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00778

AC:

308

AN:

39606

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000117

AC:

AN:

85598

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53276

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

1110628

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000365

AC:

AN:

60294

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.484

Heterozygous variant carriers

101

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000394

AC:

AN:

152366

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000456

AC XY:

AN XY:

74516

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41590

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000653

AC:

AN:

15304

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0112

AC:

AN:

5192

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10626

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68034

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.472

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000591

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000593

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2

Feb 11, 2019

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 30, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2

Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:1

Feb 16, 2017

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Tyr108Tyr in exon 5 of MYO7A: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located near a splice junction and it has been identified in 2.1% (132/6334) of East Asian ch romosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute. org; dbSNP rs116892396). -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Usher syndrome type 1B

Benign:1

Dec 06, 2019

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss

Benign:1

Sep 28, 2018

ClinGen Hearing Loss Variant Curation Expert Panel

Significance:Benign

Review Status:reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method:curation

The filtering allele frequency of the p.Tyr108= variant in the MYO7A gene is 1.45% (300/18658) of East Asian chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; calculated by using inverse allele frequency at https://www.cardiodb.org/allelefrequencyapp/), which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel for autosomal dominant hearing loss variants (BA1). -

Usher syndrome type 1

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.34

CADD

Benign

8.4

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.63

PhyloP100

1.4

Mutation Taster

=87/13

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.040

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over