11-77157346-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):āc.803A>Gā(p.Lys268Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00155 in 1,612,318 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000260.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO7A | NM_000260.4 | c.803A>G | p.Lys268Arg | missense_variant | 8/49 | ENST00000409709.9 | NP_000251.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO7A | ENST00000409709.9 | c.803A>G | p.Lys268Arg | missense_variant | 8/49 | 1 | NM_000260.4 | ENSP00000386331 | ||
MYO7A | ENST00000458637.6 | c.803A>G | p.Lys268Arg | missense_variant | 8/49 | 1 | ENSP00000392185 | P1 | ||
MYO7A | ENST00000409619.6 | c.770A>G | p.Lys257Arg | missense_variant | 9/50 | 1 | ENSP00000386635 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000946 AC: 144AN: 152202Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000949 AC: 233AN: 245618Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000923 AC XY: 123AN XY: 133242
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00161 AC: 2354AN: 1459998Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00153 AC XY: 1109AN XY: 725992
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000945 AC: 144AN: 152320Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000859 AC XY: 64AN XY: 74488
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 07, 2014 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 28, 2020 | Reported in published literature in an individual with Usher syndrome who was also heterozygous for a pathogenic variant in the USH2A gene, but was not present in an affected sibling (Bonnet et al., 2011); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30245029, 21569298, 25262649) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2019 | - - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Usher syndrome type 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 17, 2015 | p.Lys268Arg in exon 8 of MYO7A: This variant was reported in one individual with Usher syndrome type 2 but did not segregate in an affected sibling (Bonnet 2011 ). In addition, this variant was identified in 0.2% (100/53924) of European chro mosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.or g; dbSNP rs184866544). Furthermore, the lysine (Lys) residue at this position is not conserved in mammals and evolutionary distant species with two mammals, hor se and dolphin, having an arginine (Arg) at this position. In summary, this vari ant is not expected to have clinical significance based on lack of segregation w ith disease, the frequency of the variant in the general population, and conserv ation data. - |
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
MYO7A-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Aug 19, 2021 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at