11-77162903-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):c.1605C>T(p.Asn535=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00477 in 1,613,776 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 22 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0032 ( 1 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0049 ( 21 hom. )
Consequence
MYO7A
NM_000260.4 synonymous
NM_000260.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.833
Genes affected
MYO7A (HGNC:7606): (myosin VIIA) This gene is a member of the myosin gene family. Myosins are mechanochemical proteins characterized by the presence of a motor domain, an actin-binding domain, a neck domain that interacts with other proteins, and a tail domain that serves as an anchor. This gene encodes an unconventional myosin with a very short tail. Defects in this gene are associated with the mouse shaker-1 phenotype and the human Usher syndrome 1B which are characterized by deafness, reduced vestibular function, and (in human) retinal degeneration. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.36).
BP6
Variant 11-77162903-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-77162903-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 43153.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Benign=5, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr11-77162903-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr11-77162903-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.833 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00321 (488/152082) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0058 (394/67980). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00532. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 223 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 21 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO7A | NM_000260.4 | c.1605C>T | p.Asn535= | synonymous_variant | 14/49 | ENST00000409709.9 | NP_000251.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO7A | ENST00000409709.9 | c.1605C>T | p.Asn535= | synonymous_variant | 14/49 | 1 | NM_000260.4 | ENSP00000386331 | ||
MYO7A | ENST00000458637.6 | c.1605C>T | p.Asn535= | synonymous_variant | 14/49 | 1 | ENSP00000392185 | P1 | ||
MYO7A | ENST00000409619.6 | c.1572C>T | p.Asn524= | synonymous_variant | 15/50 | 1 | ENSP00000386635 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00321 AC: 488AN: 151966Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
488
AN:
151966
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00311 AC: 776AN: 249270Hom.: 6 AF XY: 0.00291 AC XY: 393AN XY: 135228
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
776
AN:
249270
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
393
AN XY:
135228
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00494 AC: 7215AN: 1461694Hom.: 21 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00473 AC XY: 3436AN XY: 727132
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
7215
AN:
1461694
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
3436
AN XY:
727132
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00321 AC: 488AN: 152082Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00300 AC XY: 223AN XY: 74332
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
488
AN:
152082
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
223
AN XY:
74332
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Apr 01, 2023 | MYO7A: BP4, BP7, BS2 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 11, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 10, 2012 | Asn535Asn in exon 14 of the MYO7A gene: This variant is not expected to have cli nical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not locat ed within the splice consensus sequence, has been identified in 0.3% (21/6912) o f European American chromosomes and 0.1% (4/3606) of African American chromosome s in a broad population by the NHLBI Exome sequencing project (http://evs.gs.was hington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs111033228). In addition, this variant was reported as benign in the literature (Weston 1996) presumably because it does not alter an a mino acid residue and is not located near a splice junction. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 08, 2015 | - - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Usher syndrome type 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Usher syndrome type 1B Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at