11-77189442-G-C

Position:

chr11-77189442-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 7P and 8B. PM1PM2PM5PP3BP4_StrongBS1

The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):c.3602G>C(p.Cys1201Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000954 in 1,613,886 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. C1201Y) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00019 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000086 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

MYO7A
NM_000260.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.75

Variant links:

Genes affected

MYO7A (HGNC:7606): (myosin VIIA) This gene is a member of the myosin gene family. Myosins are mechanochemical proteins characterized by the presence of a motor domain, an actin-binding domain, a neck domain that interacts with other proteins, and a tail domain that serves as an anchor. This gene encodes an unconventional myosin with a very short tail. Defects in this gene are associated with the mouse shaker-1 phenotype and the human Usher syndrome 1B which are characterized by deafness, reduced vestibular function, and (in human) retinal degeneration. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

MYO7A links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

PM1

In a hotspot region, there are 2 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 1 benign, 6 uncertain in NM_000260.4

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

PM5

Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr11-77189442-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 374511.We mark this variant Likely_pathogenic, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_pathogenic=2, Uncertain_significance=1}.

PP3

Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 8: AlphaMissense, BayesDel_noAF, Cadd, Eigen, M_CAP, phyloP100way_vertebrate, PROVEAN, REVEL [when max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.06198716).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00019 (29/152276) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00542 (28/5168). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00385. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 20 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
MYO7A	NM_000260.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.3602G>C	p.Cys1201Ser	missense_variant	28/49	ENST00000409709.9

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
MYO7A	ENST00000409709.9 linkuse as main transcript	c.3602G>C	p.Cys1201Ser	missense_variant	28/49	1	NM_000260.4		Q13402-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000191

AC:

AN:

152158

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00541

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000341

AC:

AN:

249124

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000296

AC XY:

AN XY:

135188

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00473

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000855

AC:

125

AN:

1461610

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000853

AC XY:

AN XY:

727080

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00295

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000133

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000190

AC:

AN:

152276

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74434

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00542

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000208

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Bravo

AF:

0.000268

ExAC

AF:

0.000298

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00231

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 29, 2024	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Jun 29, 2021	Observed as heterozygous in multiple unrelated patients with hearing loss in published literature; patients either harbored no second MYO7A variant or few patient details were provided (Yoshimura et al., 2013; Nishio et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2016; Sun et al., 2018); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29625443, 27535533, 33111992, 25788563, 27610647, 24831256, 23237960, 30245029) -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Apr 27, 2017	This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	case-control	Genetic Testing Center for Deafness, Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Institute of Otolaryngology, Chinese PLA General Hospital	-	- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 27, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Usher syndrome type 1;C1838701:Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Counsyl

Feb 08, 2017

- -

Usher syndrome type 1

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 27, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

not specified

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Apr 13, 2016

p.Cys1201Ser in exon 28 of MYO7A: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 0.4% (36/8622) of East Asian chro mosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.or g; dbSNP rs117966637). -

MYO7A-related disorder

Benign:1

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Sep 16, 2024

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.91

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.059

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.32

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.74

D;.;.;D

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.79

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.78

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.98

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.91

D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Pathogenic

0.44

MetaRNN

Benign

0.062

T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Pathogenic

0.88

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.1

M;M;.;.

MutationTaster

Benign

1.0

D;D;D

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.70

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-9.1

D;D;D;D

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.85

Sift

Uncertain

0.018

D;D;D;D

Sift4G

Benign

0.069

T;T;T;T

Polyphen

1.0

D;.;.;.

Vest4

0.93

MutPred

0.70

Gain of disorder (P = 0.1358);Gain of disorder (P = 0.1358);.;.;

MVP

0.98

MPC

0.51

ClinPred

0.19

GERP RS

5.4

Varity_R

0.87

gMVP

0.77

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over