11-77190882-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):​c.3924+12C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.522 in 1,534,358 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 211,859 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.51 ( 19657 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.52 ( 192202 hom. )

Consequence

MYO7A
NM_000260.4 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0760

Publications

15 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO7A (HGNC:7606): (myosin VIIA) This gene is a member of the myosin gene family. Myosins are mechanochemical proteins characterized by the presence of a motor domain, an actin-binding domain, a neck domain that interacts with other proteins, and a tail domain that serves as an anchor. This gene encodes an unconventional myosin with a very short tail. Defects in this gene are associated with the mouse shaker-1 phenotype and the human Usher syndrome 1B which are characterized by deafness, reduced vestibular function, and (in human) retinal degeneration. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
MYO7A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, G2P
  • Usher syndrome type 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, PanelApp Australia
  • Usher syndrome type 1B
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Usher syndrome type 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BP6
Variant 11-77190882-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-77190882-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 43226.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.578 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYO7ANM_000260.4 linkc.3924+12C>T intron_variant Intron 30 of 48 ENST00000409709.9 NP_000251.3 Q13402-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYO7AENST00000409709.9 linkc.3924+12C>T intron_variant Intron 30 of 48 1 NM_000260.4 ENSP00000386331.3 Q13402-1
MYO7AENST00000458637.6 linkc.3924+12C>T intron_variant Intron 30 of 48 1 ENSP00000392185.2 Q13402-2
MYO7AENST00000409619.6 linkc.3891+12C>T intron_variant Intron 31 of 49 1 ENSP00000386635.2 Q13402-8
MYO7AENST00000458169.2 linkc.1467+12C>T intron_variant Intron 10 of 28 1 ENSP00000417017.2 H7C4D8
MYO7AENST00000670577.1 linkn.1764+12C>T intron_variant Intron 13 of 31 ENSP00000499323.1 A0A590UJ94

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.506
AC:
76584
AN:
151492
Hom.:
19643
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.440
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.476
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.588
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.381
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.468
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.343
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.618
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.437
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.530
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.507
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.518
AC:
87106
AN:
168156
AF XY:
0.506
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.439
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.635
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.388
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.483
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.621
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.533
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.500
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.524
AC:
724604
AN:
1382756
Hom.:
192202
Cov.:
37
AF XY:
0.519
AC XY:
351809
AN XY:
678500
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.430
AC:
13340
AN:
31000
American (AMR)
AF:
0.625
AC:
21651
AN:
34656
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.378
AC:
9149
AN:
24224
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.477
AC:
17074
AN:
35760
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.368
AC:
28911
AN:
78530
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.617
AC:
30290
AN:
49106
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.388
AC:
2150
AN:
5540
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.538
AC:
573875
AN:
1066922
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.494
AC:
28164
AN:
57018
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.483
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
16723
33446
50170
66893
83616
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
16666
33332
49998
66664
83330
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.505
AC:
76627
AN:
151602
Hom.:
19657
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.508
AC XY:
37660
AN XY:
74088
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.440
AC:
18117
AN:
41182
American (AMR)
AF:
0.588
AC:
8973
AN:
15258
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.381
AC:
1314
AN:
3446
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.468
AC:
2404
AN:
5140
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.344
AC:
1654
AN:
4808
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.618
AC:
6531
AN:
10568
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.442
AC:
130
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.530
AC:
36013
AN:
67898
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.504
AC:
1061
AN:
2104
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1953
3906
5859
7812
9765
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
670
1340
2010
2680
3350
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.518
Hom.:
55526
Bravo
AF:
0.504

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 23, 2009
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 22, 2025
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 01, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 01, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 01, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.83
CADD
Benign
8.5
DANN
Benign
0.68
PhyloP100
0.076
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2276285; hg19: chr11-76901927; COSMIC: COSV68686532; API