11-77201545-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):​c.4950C>T​(p.Asn1650Asn) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00333 in 1,613,862 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 153 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.018 ( 76 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0018 ( 77 hom. )

Consequence

MYO7A
NM_000260.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.45
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO7A (HGNC:7606): (myosin VIIA) This gene is a member of the myosin gene family. Myosins are mechanochemical proteins characterized by the presence of a motor domain, an actin-binding domain, a neck domain that interacts with other proteins, and a tail domain that serves as an anchor. This gene encodes an unconventional myosin with a very short tail. Defects in this gene are associated with the mouse shaker-1 phenotype and the human Usher syndrome 1B which are characterized by deafness, reduced vestibular function, and (in human) retinal degeneration. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.57).
BP6
Variant 11-77201545-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-77201545-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 43265.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-77201545-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.45 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0596 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYO7ANM_000260.4 linkc.4950C>T p.Asn1650Asn synonymous_variant Exon 36 of 49 ENST00000409709.9 NP_000251.3 Q13402-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYO7AENST00000409709.9 linkc.4950C>T p.Asn1650Asn synonymous_variant Exon 36 of 49 1 NM_000260.4 ENSP00000386331.3 Q13402-1
MYO7AENST00000458637.6 linkc.4836C>T p.Asn1612Asn synonymous_variant Exon 36 of 49 1 ENSP00000392185.2 Q13402-2
MYO7AENST00000409619.6 linkc.4803C>T p.Asn1601Asn synonymous_variant Exon 37 of 50 1 ENSP00000386635.2 Q13402-8
MYO7AENST00000458169.2 linkc.2376C>T p.Asn792Asn synonymous_variant Exon 16 of 29 1 ENSP00000417017.2 H7C4D8
MYO7AENST00000670577.1 linkn.2790C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 19 of 32 ENSP00000499323.1 A0A590UJ94

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0176
AC:
2674
AN:
152098
Hom.:
76
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0617
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00478
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000250
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0143
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00451
AC:
1123
AN:
249200
Hom.:
29
AF XY:
0.00337
AC XY:
456
AN XY:
135194
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0656
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000556
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000980
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000168
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00215
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00184
AC:
2694
AN:
1461646
Hom.:
77
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00160
AC XY:
1161
AN XY:
727112
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0654
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00259
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000927
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000127
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00374
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0176
AC:
2678
AN:
152216
Hom.:
76
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0176
AC XY:
1313
AN XY:
74416
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0616
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00477
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000250
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0142
Alfa
AF:
0.0106
Hom.:
15
Bravo
AF:
0.0203
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00404
AC:
14
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000273
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Jun 21, 2011
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Asn1650Asn in exon 36 of MYO7A: This variant is predicted to be benign based on its high frequency in the general population (dbSNP rs80033599). -

Dec 18, 2017
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Usher syndrome type 1B Benign:1
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.57
CADD
Benign
1.1
DANN
Benign
0.76
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80033599; hg19: chr11-76912590; API