11-77214596-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The ENST00000409709.9(MYO7A):c.6559-11C>T variant causes a splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0214 in 1,556,648 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 422 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.015 ( 19 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.022 ( 403 hom. )
Consequence
MYO7A
ENST00000409709.9 splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
ENST00000409709.9 splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
Scores
2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0002975
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.0470
Genes affected
MYO7A (HGNC:7606): (myosin VIIA) This gene is a member of the myosin gene family. Myosins are mechanochemical proteins characterized by the presence of a motor domain, an actin-binding domain, a neck domain that interacts with other proteins, and a tail domain that serves as an anchor. This gene encodes an unconventional myosin with a very short tail. Defects in this gene are associated with the mouse shaker-1 phenotype and the human Usher syndrome 1B which are characterized by deafness, reduced vestibular function, and (in human) retinal degeneration. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.54).
BP6
Variant 11-77214596-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-77214596-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 43334.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-77214596-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0152 (2320/152312) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0251 (121/4822). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0216. There are 19 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1125 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 19 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO7A | NM_000260.4 | c.6559-11C>T | splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000409709.9 | NP_000251.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO7A | ENST00000409709.9 | c.6559-11C>T | splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_000260.4 | ENSP00000386331 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0153 AC: 2324AN: 152194Hom.: 20 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
2324
AN:
152194
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0181 AC: 3287AN: 181230Hom.: 39 AF XY: 0.0192 AC XY: 1855AN XY: 96400
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
3287
AN:
181230
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1855
AN XY:
96400
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0221 AC: 31054AN: 1404336Hom.: 403 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.0222 AC XY: 15421AN XY: 694742
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
31054
AN:
1404336
Hom.:
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
AC XY:
15421
AN XY:
694742
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0152 AC: 2320AN: 152312Hom.: 19 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0151 AC XY: 1125AN XY: 74470
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
2320
AN:
152312
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1125
AN XY:
74470
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
42
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 29, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 23, 2012 | 6559-11C>T in Intron 48 of MYO7A: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 1.9% (127/6834) of European Ameri can chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (h ttp://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs34517202). - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at