11-78114274-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_024079.5(ALG8):āc.665A>Gā(p.Asn222Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.216 in 1,613,832 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 39,483 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024079.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALG8 | NM_024079.5 | c.665A>G | p.Asn222Ser | missense_variant | 6/13 | ENST00000299626.10 | NP_076984.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALG8 | ENST00000299626.10 | c.665A>G | p.Asn222Ser | missense_variant | 6/13 | 1 | NM_024079.5 | ENSP00000299626.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.178 AC: 27115AN: 152124Hom.: 2909 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.202 AC: 50661AN: 250942Hom.: 5531 AF XY: 0.206 AC XY: 27991AN XY: 135622
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.220 AC: 321515AN: 1461590Hom.: 36573 Cov.: 39 AF XY: 0.221 AC XY: 160373AN XY: 727118
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.178 AC: 27122AN: 152242Hom.: 2910 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.178 AC XY: 13213AN XY: 74420
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
ALG8 congenital disorder of glycosylation Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 14, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics | May 31, 2018 | This variant is interpreted as a Benign - Stand Alone, for Congenital disorder of glycosylation, type Ih, in Autosomal Recessive manner. The following ACMG Tag(s) were applied: BA1 => Allele frequency is >5% in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes Project, or Exome Aggregation Consortium. - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 04, 2012 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 05, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at