11-8038960-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6BP7
The NM_003320.5(TUB):c.87C>T(p.Pro29Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,461,800 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P29P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003320.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- retinal dystrophy and obesityInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
- retinitis pigmentosaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- essential tremorInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_003320.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUB | TSL:1 | c.87C>T | p.Pro29Pro | synonymous | Exon 1 of 13 | ENSP00000305426.4 | P50607-2 | ||
| TUB | TSL:2 | c.56+19602C>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000434400.1 | E9PQR4 | |||
| ENSG00000254921 | TSL:4 | n.226G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 2 of 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1461800Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727204 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at