11-93667736-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_033395.2(CEP295):c.238C>A(p.Gln80Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0037 in 1,551,274 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 192 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_033395.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEP295 | NM_033395.2 | c.238C>A | p.Gln80Lys | missense_variant | 3/30 | ENST00000325212.11 | NP_203753.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEP295 | ENST00000325212.11 | c.238C>A | p.Gln80Lys | missense_variant | 3/30 | 2 | NM_033395.2 | ENSP00000316681.6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0200 AC: 3044AN: 152038Hom.: 108 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00434 AC: 680AN: 156528Hom.: 23 AF XY: 0.00317 AC XY: 263AN XY: 82918
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00192 AC: 2686AN: 1399118Hom.: 82 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00165 AC XY: 1141AN XY: 690076
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0201 AC: 3059AN: 152156Hom.: 110 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0196 AC XY: 1461AN XY: 74392
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Aug 08, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at