11-9992538-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_030962.4(SBF2):āc.1173A>Gā(p.Ala391Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00891 in 1,610,934 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 117 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0072 ( 9 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.0091 ( 108 hom. )
Consequence
SBF2
NM_030962.4 synonymous
NM_030962.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.80
Genes affected
SBF2 (HGNC:2135): (SET binding factor 2) This gene encodes a pseudophosphatase and member of the myotubularin-related protein family. This gene maps within the CMT4B2 candidate region of chromosome 11p15 and mutations in this gene have been associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease, type 4B2. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.43).
BP6
Variant 11-9992538-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-9992538-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 220575.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-9992538-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.8 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00725 (1103/152182) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0131 (63/4820). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0105. There are 9 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 509 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 9 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBF2 | NM_030962.4 | c.1173A>G | p.Ala391Ala | synonymous_variant | 12/40 | ENST00000256190.13 | NP_112224.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBF2 | ENST00000256190.13 | c.1173A>G | p.Ala391Ala | synonymous_variant | 12/40 | 1 | NM_030962.4 | ENSP00000256190.8 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00725 AC: 1102AN: 152064Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1102
AN:
152064
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00751 AC: 1870AN: 249112Hom.: 14 AF XY: 0.00828 AC XY: 1115AN XY: 134626
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1870
AN:
249112
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1115
AN XY:
134626
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00909 AC: 13256AN: 1458752Hom.: 108 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00941 AC XY: 6828AN XY: 725494
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
13256
AN:
1458752
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
6828
AN XY:
725494
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00725 AC: 1103AN: 152182Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00684 AC XY: 509AN XY: 74412
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1103
AN:
152182
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
509
AN XY:
74412
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
17
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | ENSG00000286561: BS1, BS2; SBF2: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Nov 02, 2017 | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4B2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 26, 2023 | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre | - | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 11, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at