12-101770477-T-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_024312.5(GNPTAB):​c.1042A>C​(p.Ile348Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00213 in 1,613,892 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 50 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.012 ( 24 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 26 hom. )

Consequence

GNPTAB
NM_024312.5 missense

Scores

2
10
5

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.84

Publications

12 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
GNPTAB (HGNC:29670): (N-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphate transferase subunits alpha and beta) This gene encodes two of three subunit types of the membrane-bound enzyme N-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphotransferase, a heterohexameric complex composed of two alpha, two beta, and two gamma subunits. The encoded protein is proteolytically cleaved at the Lys928-Asp929 bond to yield mature alpha and beta polypeptides while the gamma subunits are the product of a distinct gene (GeneID 84572). In the Golgi apparatus, the heterohexameric complex catalyzes the first step in the synthesis of mannose 6-phosphate recognition markers on certain oligosaccharides of newly synthesized lysosomal enzymes. These recognition markers are essential for appropriate trafficking of lysosomal enzymes. Mutations in this gene have been associated with both mucolipidosis II and mucolipidosis IIIA.[provided by RefSeq, May 2010]
GNPTAB Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • GNPTAB-mucolipidosis
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • mucolipidosis
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Myriad Women’s Health
  • mucolipidosis type II
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp
  • mucolipidosis type III, alpha/beta
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009780139).
BP6
Variant 12-101770477-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-101770477-T-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 39020.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0117 (1781/152316) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0411 (1707/41564). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0394. There are 24 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 812 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 24 AR gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_024312.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
GNPTAB
NM_024312.5
MANE Select
c.1042A>Cp.Ile348Leu
missense
Exon 9 of 21NP_077288.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
GNPTAB
ENST00000299314.12
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.1042A>Cp.Ile348Leu
missense
Exon 9 of 21ENSP00000299314.7
GNPTAB
ENST00000549940.5
TSL:1
c.1042A>Cp.Ile348Leu
missense
Exon 9 of 11ENSP00000449150.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0117
AC:
1783
AN:
152198
Hom.:
24
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0412
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00386
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00621
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00302
AC:
759
AN:
251420
AF XY:
0.00216
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0425
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00162
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000528
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000652
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00113
AC:
1654
AN:
1461576
Hom.:
26
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000989
AC XY:
719
AN XY:
727110
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0416
AC:
1392
AN:
33460
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00168
AC:
75
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000464
AC:
4
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00173
AC:
10
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000162
AC:
18
AN:
1111738
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00257
AC:
155
AN:
60380
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.488
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
89
178
266
355
444
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
44
88
132
176
220
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0117
AC:
1781
AN:
152316
Hom.:
24
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0109
AC XY:
812
AN XY:
74484
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0411
AC:
1707
AN:
41564
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00386
AC:
59
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5190
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000294
AC:
2
AN:
68022
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00614
AC:
13
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
82
164
245
327
409
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00415
Hom.:
38
Bravo
AF:
0.0129
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0397
AC:
175
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00375
AC:
455
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Mar 24, 2019
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27884173, 19617216, 25505245, 22995991)

Sep 27, 2017
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 24, 2017
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

GNPTAB: BS1, BS2

Mucolipidosis type II Benign:3Other:1
Apr 28, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign.

GeneReviews
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:literature only

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 09, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:3
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 25, 2020
Al Jalila Children’s Genomics Center, Al Jalila Childrens Speciality Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 10, 2021
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Pseudo-Hurler polydystrophy;C2673377:Mucolipidosis type II Benign:2
Jan 30, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 09, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Pseudo-Hurler polydystrophy Benign:1
Apr 28, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.27
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.22
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.050
CADD
Pathogenic
26
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.67
D
Eigen
Uncertain
0.64
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.65
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.93
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0098
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.10
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.5
L
PhyloP100
5.8
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.75
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.9
N
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.68
Sift
Uncertain
0.0090
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.012
D
Polyphen
0.90
P
Vest4
0.60
MVP
0.91
MPC
0.79
ClinPred
0.024
T
GERP RS
5.6
Varity_R
0.45
gMVP
0.79
Mutation Taster
=58/42
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs7958709; hg19: chr12-102164255; API