12-109796714-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_021625.5(TRPV4):c.1153-10C>T variant causes a splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00739 in 1,605,754 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 53 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0055 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0076 ( 49 hom. )
Consequence
TRPV4
NM_021625.5 splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
NM_021625.5 splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
Scores
2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00002116
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.36
Genes affected
TRPV4 (HGNC:18083): (transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 4) This gene encodes a member of the OSM9-like transient receptor potential channel (OTRPC) subfamily in the transient receptor potential (TRP) superfamily of ion channels. The encoded protein is a Ca2+-permeable, nonselective cation channel that is thought to be involved in the regulation of systemic osmotic pressure. Mutations in this gene are the cause of spondylometaphyseal and metatropic dysplasia and hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy type IIC. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BP6
Variant 12-109796714-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-109796714-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 137724.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-109796714-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00553 (843/152310) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00885 (602/68020). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00827. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 406 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 843 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRPV4 | NM_021625.5 | c.1153-10C>T | splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000261740.7 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRPV4 | ENST00000261740.7 | c.1153-10C>T | splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_021625.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes 0.00553 AC: 842AN: 152192Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
842
AN:
152192
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00562 AC: 1388AN: 246922Hom.: 9 AF XY: 0.00606 AC XY: 808AN XY: 133400
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1388
AN:
246922
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
808
AN XY:
133400
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00758 AC: 11017AN: 1453444Hom.: 49 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00755 AC XY: 5449AN XY: 721564
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
11017
AN:
1453444
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
5449
AN XY:
721564
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome 0.00553 AC: 843AN: 152310Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00545 AC XY: 406AN XY: 74476
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
843
AN:
152310
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
406
AN XY:
74476
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
| Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
| Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 06, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
| Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
| Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
| Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 25, 2015 | - - |
| Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2C Benign:2
| Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
| Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
| Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 03, 2023 | - - |
| Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Aug 08, 2018 | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
| Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre | - | - - |
Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, autosomal dominant 8 Benign:1
| Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Scapuloperoneal spinal muscular atrophy Benign:1
| Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Brachyrachia (short spine dysplasia) Benign:1
| Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Metatropic dysplasia Benign:1
| Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, Kozlowski type Benign:1
| Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, Kozlowski type;C0265281:Metatropic dysplasia;C0432227:Brachyrachia (short spine dysplasia);C0751335:Scapuloperoneal spinal muscular atrophy;C1838492:Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, autosomal dominant 8;C1847406:Familial digital arthropathy-brachydactyly;C1853710:Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2C;C1868616:Parastremmatic dwarfism;C3150755:Sodium serum level quantitative trait locus 1;C3159322:Spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasia, Maroteaux type;C4479260:Avascular necrosis of femoral head, primary, 2 Benign:1
| Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 05, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at