12-112418867-C-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBS1_SupportingBS2
The ENST00000531326.1(PTPN11):n.359C>G variant causes a non coding transcript exon change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000235 in 510,242 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00031 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
PTPN11
ENST00000531326.1 non_coding_transcript_exon
ENST00000531326.1 non_coding_transcript_exon
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.06
Genes affected
PTPN11 (HGNC:9644): (protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) family. PTPs are known to be signaling molecules that regulate a variety of cellular processes including cell growth, differentiation, mitotic cycle, and oncogenic transformation. This PTP contains two tandem Src homology-2 domains, which function as phospho-tyrosine binding domains and mediate the interaction of this PTP with its substrates. This PTP is widely expressed in most tissues and plays a regulatory role in various cell signaling events that are important for a diversity of cell functions, such as mitogenic activation, metabolic control, transcription regulation, and cell migration. Mutations in this gene are a cause of Noonan syndrome as well as acute myeloid leukemia. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]
RPL6 (HGNC:10362): (ribosomal protein L6) This gene encodes a protein component of the 60S ribosomal subunit. This protein can bind specifically to domain C of the tax-responsive enhancer element of human T-cell leukemia virus type 1, and may participate in tax-mediated transactivation of transcription. As is typical for genes encoding ribosomal proteins, there are multiple processed pseudogenes of this gene dispersed throughout the genome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.39).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000307 (110/357908) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00471 (109/23154). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00399. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 46 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 3. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 10 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPL6 | NM_001320141.2 | upstream_gene_variant | NP_001307070.1 | |||||
RPL6 | XM_047429302.1 | upstream_gene_variant | XP_047285258.1 | |||||
RPL6 | XM_047429303.1 | upstream_gene_variant | XP_047285259.1 | |||||
RPL6 | XM_047429304.1 | upstream_gene_variant | XP_047285260.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTPN11 | ENST00000531326.1 | n.359C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/2 | 4 | |||||
PTPN11 | ENST00000392597.5 | upstream_gene_variant | 1 | ENSP00000376376 | ||||||
RPL6 | ENST00000551291.6 | upstream_gene_variant | 3 | ENSP00000448067 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000657 AC: 10AN: 152216Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
152216
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000307 AC: 110AN: 357908Hom.: 0 Cov.: 3 AF XY: 0.000244 AC XY: 46AN XY: 188642
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
110
AN:
357908
Hom.:
Cov.:
3
AF XY:
AC XY:
46
AN XY:
188642
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000656 AC: 10AN: 152334Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000805 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74500
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
152334
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74500
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3476
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
LEOPARD syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Metachondromatosis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Noonan syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at