12-123672090-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_024809.5(TCTN2):​c.225C>T​(p.Asn75Asn) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.026 in 1,613,876 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,195 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.055 ( 450 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.023 ( 745 hom. )

Consequence

TCTN2
NM_024809.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.841

Publications

10 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TCTN2 (HGNC:25774): (tectonic family member 2) This gene encodes a type I membrane protein that belongs to the tectonic family. Studies in mice suggest that this protein may be involved in hedgehog signaling, and essential for ciliogenesis. Mutations in this gene are associated with Meckel syndrome type 8. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2011]
TCTN2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Joubert syndrome 24
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • Joubert syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Meckel syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
BP6
Variant 12-123672090-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-123672090-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 126287.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.841 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.131 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TCTN2NM_024809.5 linkc.225C>T p.Asn75Asn synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 18 ENST00000303372.7 NP_079085.2
TCTN2NM_001143850.3 linkc.225C>T p.Asn75Asn synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 18 NP_001137322.1
TCTN2NM_001410989.1 linkc.225C>T p.Asn75Asn synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 17 NP_001397918.1
TCTN2XM_017019974.2 linkc.225C>T p.Asn75Asn synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 17 XP_016875463.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TCTN2ENST00000303372.7 linkc.225C>T p.Asn75Asn synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 18 1 NM_024809.5 ENSP00000304941.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0547
AC:
8313
AN:
152090
Hom.:
452
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.134
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0748
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0231
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00694
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0346
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00669
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0285
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0171
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0402
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0305
AC:
7671
AN:
251492
AF XY:
0.0288
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.134
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0500
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0225
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00701
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00813
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0161
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0233
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0230
AC:
33578
AN:
1461668
Hom.:
745
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0231
AC XY:
16826
AN XY:
727164
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.136
AC:
4551
AN:
33456
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0540
AC:
2413
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0229
AC:
599
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00443
AC:
176
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0425
AC:
3666
AN:
86242
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00863
AC:
461
AN:
53416
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0323
AC:
186
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0178
AC:
19827
AN:
1111850
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0281
AC:
1699
AN:
60386
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.451
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1832
3663
5495
7326
9158
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
884
1768
2652
3536
4420
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0547
AC:
8330
AN:
152208
Hom.:
450
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0540
AC XY:
4021
AN XY:
74424
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.134
AC:
5578
AN:
41494
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0747
AC:
1142
AN:
15286
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0231
AC:
80
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00695
AC:
36
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0348
AC:
168
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00669
AC:
71
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0306
AC:
9
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0171
AC:
1162
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0398
AC:
84
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
380
760
1140
1520
1900
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
86
172
258
344
430
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0331
Hom.:
106
Bravo
AF:
0.0616
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0310
AC:
111
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0189
EpiControl
AF:
0.0174

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Mar 04, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Joubert syndrome 24 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Meckel syndrome, type 8 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Joubert syndrome Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.81
CADD
Benign
7.7
DANN
Benign
0.78
PhyloP100
0.84
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs73416301; hg19: chr12-124156637; COSMIC: COSV57633075; API