Genetic Variant ATP6V0A2:p.Leu12Leu (chr12-123712599-C-T) – ACMG Classification: Uncertain_significance (0 pts)

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate

The NM_012463.4(ATP6V0A2):c.34C>T(p.Leu12Leu) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000187 in 1,602,630 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 6.9e-7 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ATP6V0A2
NM_012463.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Not reported in ClinVar

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.42

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

ATP6V0A2 (HGNC:18481): (ATPase H+ transporting V0 subunit a2) The protein encoded by this gene is a subunit of the vacuolar ATPase (v-ATPase), an heteromultimeric enzyme that is present in intracellular vesicles and in the plasma membrane of specialized cells, and which is essential for the acidification of diverse cellular components. V-ATPase is comprised of a membrane peripheral V(1) domain for ATP hydrolysis, and an integral membrane V(0) domain for proton translocation. The subunit encoded by this gene is a component of the V(0) domain. Mutations in this gene are a cause of both cutis laxa type II and wrinkly skin syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2009]

ATP6V0A2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive cutis laxa type 2A
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
wrinkly skin syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
autosomal recessive cutis laxa type 2, classic type
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet

ATP6V0A2 links:

LOC105370042 (HGNC:):

LOC105370042 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.41).

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_012463.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Sel.	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	ATP6V0A2	NM_012463.4	MANE Select	c.34C>T	p.Leu12Leu	synonymous	Exon 1 of 20	NP_036595.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
ATP6V0A2	ENST00000330342.8	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.34C>T	p.Leu12Leu	synonymous	Exon 1 of 20	ENSP00000332247.2	Q9Y487
ATP6V0A2	ENST00000613625.5	TSL:1	c.34C>T	p.Leu12Leu	synonymous	Exon 1 of 9	ENSP00000482236.1	Q8TBM3
ATP6V0A2	ENST00000540368.6	TSL:1	n.65C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon	Exon 1 of 18

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152220

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000482

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

6.89e-7

AC:

AN:

1450410

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000139

AC XY:

AN XY:

720786

show subpopulations

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000301

AC:

AN:

33254

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

43644

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25758

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39224

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

84646

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

50248

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5742

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

1107996

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

59898

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.325

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152220

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

74370

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000482

AC:

AN:

41468

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15294

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5178

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4834

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10626

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68030

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.525

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000756

ClinVar

Not reported in ClinVar

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.41

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.96

PhyloP100

4.4

PromoterAI

-0.031

Neutral

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over