12-132634175-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_006231.4(POLE):​c.6004+11A>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00108 in 1,604,464 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00069 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

POLE
NM_006231.4 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.78

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
POLE (HGNC:9177): (DNA polymerase epsilon, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon. The enzyme is involved in DNA repair and chromosomal DNA replication. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer 12 and facial dysmorphism, immunodeficiency, livedo, and short stature. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]
POLE Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • POLE-related polyposis and colorectal cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • facial dysmorphism-immunodeficiency-livedo-short stature syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • intrauterine growth retardation, metaphyseal dysplasia, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, genital anomalies, and immunodeficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P
  • IMAGe syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Polymerase proofreading-related adenomatous polyposis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.92).
BP6
Variant 12-132634175-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-132634175-T-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 371944.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000689 (105/152344) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00131 (89/68032). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00109. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 37 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
POLENM_006231.4 linkc.6004+11A>G intron_variant Intron 43 of 48 ENST00000320574.10 NP_006222.2
POLEXM_011534795.4 linkc.6004+11A>G intron_variant Intron 43 of 47 XP_011533097.1
POLEXM_011534797.4 linkc.5083+11A>G intron_variant Intron 35 of 39 XP_011533099.1
POLEXM_011534802.4 linkc.2992+11A>G intron_variant Intron 19 of 23 XP_011533104.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
POLEENST00000320574.10 linkc.6004+11A>G intron_variant Intron 43 of 48 1 NM_006231.4 ENSP00000322570.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000690
AC:
105
AN:
152226
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000958
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000645
AC:
156
AN:
241790
AF XY:
0.000651
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000123
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000586
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000143
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00132
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00101
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00113
AC:
1635
AN:
1452120
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00107
AC XY:
774
AN XY:
721700
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000150
AC:
5
AN:
33418
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000226
AC:
1
AN:
44304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25344
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39670
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
84438
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000226
AC:
12
AN:
53000
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5704
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
1574
AN:
1106188
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000716
AC:
43
AN:
60054
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.445
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
72
144
216
288
360
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
56
112
168
224
280
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000689
AC:
105
AN:
152344
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000497
AC XY:
37
AN XY:
74486
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000192
AC:
8
AN:
41586
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000261
AC:
4
AN:
15312
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000188
AC:
2
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00131
AC:
89
AN:
68032
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000948
AC:
2
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.492
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
5
11
16
22
27
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00100
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000635
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:6
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 27, 2017
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The POLE c.6004+11A>G variant was not identified in the literature. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs201591857) as "With Likely benign allele", ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Counsyl and GeneDx), Clinvitae, and LOVD 3.0 (1x probably does not affect function). The variant was identified in control databases in 178 of 267654 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.001 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: African in 2 of 23996 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), Other in 8 of 6250 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), Latino in 2 of 34004 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), European in 162 of 121032 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), Finnish in 4 of 25162 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002); it was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, or South Asian populations. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant is classified as likely benign.

Apr 29, 2022
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Jul 28, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Oct 25, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The c.6004+11A>G intronic alteration consists of a A to G substitution 1 nucleotides after coding exon 43 in the POLE gene. Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.

not specified Benign:2
Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 29, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12 Benign:1
Sep 02, 2016
Counsyl
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.92
CADD
Benign
0.28
DANN
Benign
0.48
PhyloP100
-1.8
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201591857; hg19: chr12-133210761; API