12-132649021-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_006231.4(POLE):​c.4057A>G​(p.Ser1353Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000766 in 1,613,788 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00058 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00078 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

POLE
NM_006231.4 missense

Scores

1
18

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.93
Variant links:
Genes affected
POLE (HGNC:9177): (DNA polymerase epsilon, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon. The enzyme is involved in DNA repair and chromosomal DNA replication. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer 12 and facial dysmorphism, immunodeficiency, livedo, and short stature. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.012595266).
BP6
Variant 12-132649021-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-132649021-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 240500.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=7, Uncertain_significance=3, Benign=1}. Variant chr12-132649021-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
POLENM_006231.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.4057A>G p.Ser1353Gly missense_variant 32/49 ENST00000320574.10 NP_006222.2 Q07864

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
POLEENST00000320574.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.4057A>G p.Ser1353Gly missense_variant 32/491 NM_006231.4 ENSP00000322570.5 Q07864

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000585
AC:
89
AN:
152248
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0121
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00122
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000794
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000555
AC:
139
AN:
250366
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000517
AC XY:
70
AN XY:
135444
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000247
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000174
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00159
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000805
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000654
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000785
AC:
1147
AN:
1461540
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000708
AC XY:
515
AN XY:
727090
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000119
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000201
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00154
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000923
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000431
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000585
AC:
89
AN:
152248
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000605
AC XY:
45
AN XY:
74388
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00122
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000794
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000956
Alfa
AF:
0.000759
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000574
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000778
AC:
3
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00151
AC:
13
ExAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
63
EpiCase
AF:
0.000709
EpiControl
AF:
0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:7
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 13, 2021This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22885699) -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesFeb 07, 2023The POLE c.4057A>G; p.Ser1353Gly variant (rs141619382) is reported in the literature in individuals affected with cancer, but without clear disease association (Bhai 2021, Garmezy 2022, Mur 2020). This variant is also reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 240500), and is found in the general population with an overall allele frequency of 0.06% (157/281776 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. Computational analyses are uncertain whether this variant is neutral or deleterious (REVEL: 0.168). Additionally, this variant is not located in the exonuclease domain (Palles 2013), and gene-disease association has not been established for variants outside of the exonuclease domain (Seifert 2019). Due to limited information, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain at this time. References: Bhai P et al. Analysis of Sequence and Copy Number Variants in Canadian Patient Cohort With Familial Cancer Syndromes Using a Unique Next Generation Sequencing Based Approach. Front Genet. 2021 Jul 13;12:698595. PMID: 34326862. Garmezy B et al. Clinical and Molecular Characterization of POLE Mutations as Predictive Biomarkers of Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Cancers. JCO Precis Oncol. 2022 Feb;6:e2100267. PMID: 35108036. Mur P et al. Role of POLE and POLD1 in familial cancer. Genet Med. 2020 Dec;22(12):2089-2100. PMID: 32792570. Palles C et al. Germline mutations affecting the proofreading domains of POLE and POLD1 predispose to colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. Nat Genet. 2013 Feb;45(2):136-44. PMID: 23263490. Seifert BA et al. Determining the clinical validity of hereditary colorectal cancer and polyposis susceptibility genes using the Clinical Genome Resource Clinical Validity Framework. Genet Med. 2019 Jul;21(7):1507-1516. PMID: 30523343. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenSep 01, 2024POLE: BP4, BS1:Supporting -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
not specified Uncertain:2Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJul 01, 2019- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJun 05, 2023Variant summary: POLE c.4057A>G (p.Ser1353Gly) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00056 in 250366 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0008 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 56-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in POLE causing Colorectal Cancer phenotype (1.4e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism. The variant, c.4057A>G, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with polyposis and other tumor phenotypes (e.g. Mur_2020, Garmezy_2022), however without strong evidence for causality. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. This variant is located outside of the exonuclease domain, and while missense variants that disrupt the 3'-5' exonuclease (proof-reading) activity of the POLE protein have been known to be associated with an increased risk for colonic adenomatous polyps and colon cancer, however, missense variants outside the exonuclease domain, are unlikely to be associated with polyposis or colon cancer (see e.g. PMID: 23263490, 23447401). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 32792570, 35108036). 12 clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoMar 28, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalJul 31, 2024- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsApr 05, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jan 13, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 28, 2024This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Polymerase proofreading-related adenomatous polyposis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The POLE p.Ser1353Gly variant was identified in 1 of 2080 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0005) from an individual with advanced cancer (Mandelker 2017). The variant was identified in dbSNP (rs141619382) as “with other allele” and ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Ambry Genetics, GeneDx, PreventionGenetics and 1 other submitter and likely benign by Invitae and Quest Diagnostics). The variant was identified in control databases in 159 of 276,260 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0006 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 5 of 23,992 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Other in 4 of 6450 chromosomes (freq: 0.0006), Latino in 6 of 34,396 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), European in 108 of 126,130 chromosomes (freq: 0.0009), Finnish in 36 of 25,534 chromosomes (freq: 0.001); it was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian and South Asian populations. The p.Ser1353 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 2 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
POLE-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesFeb 16, 2023This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Hereditary cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsJan 23, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.061
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.47
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.44
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Benign
0.95
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.092
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.16
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.050
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
1.0
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.82
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0083
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.013
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.78
N;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.36
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.0
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.17
Sift
Benign
0.49
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.56
T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;B
Vest4
0.41
MVP
0.43
MPC
0.17
ClinPred
0.039
T
GERP RS
5.5
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.2
Varity_R
0.12
gMVP
0.24

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs141619382; hg19: chr12-133225607; API