12-132675786-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PP3_Moderate
The NM_006231.4(POLE):c.1055A>C(p.Gln352Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000297 in 1,614,118 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q352E) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006231.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- POLE-related polyposis and colorectal cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- facial dysmorphism-immunodeficiency-livedo-short stature syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- intrauterine growth retardation, metaphyseal dysplasia, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, genital anomalies, and immunodeficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P
- IMAGe syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Polymerase proofreading-related adenomatous polyposisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POLE | NM_006231.4 | c.1055A>C | p.Gln352Pro | missense_variant | Exon 11 of 49 | ENST00000320574.10 | NP_006222.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POLE | ENST00000320574.10 | c.1055A>C | p.Gln352Pro | missense_variant | Exon 11 of 49 | 1 | NM_006231.4 | ENSP00000322570.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152240Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 251488 AF XY: 0.0000221 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000308 AC: 45AN: 1461878Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000275 AC XY: 20AN XY: 727240 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152240Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74380 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:4
In the published literature, this variant has been reported in individuals with melanoma and colorectal cancer (PMIDs: 26251183 (2015) and 25559809 (2015)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000035 (4/113762 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek 2016); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with colorectal cancer or melanoma (Aoude 2015, Chubb 2015); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31034466, 26251183, 25559809, 2559809) -
This sequence change replaces glutamine, which is neutral and polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 352 of the POLE protein (p.Gln352Pro). This variant is present in population databases (rs766094330, gnomAD 0.004%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with colorectal cancer and malignant melanoma (PMID: 25559809, 26251183). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 372024). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt POLE protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
- -
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12 Uncertain:3
- -
This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -
not specified Uncertain:1
- -
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 10 Uncertain:1
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
The p.Q352P variant (also known as c.1055A>C), located in coding exon 11 of the POLE gene, results from an A to C substitution at nucleotide position 1055. The glutamine at codon 352 is replaced by proline, an amino acid with similar properties. This variant has been reported in 1/1243 individuals with cutaneous melanoma who underwent targeted sequencing of the POLE gene (Aoude LG et al. Fam. Cancer. 2015 Dec;14:621-8). This alteration has also been identified in an individual with colorectal cancer (Chubb D et al. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015 Feb;33(5):426-32). This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at