12-132681187-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1
The NM_006231.4(POLE):c.155G>A(p.Arg52Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000434 in 1,614,134 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R52W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006231.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- POLE-related polyposis and colorectal cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- facial dysmorphism-immunodeficiency-livedo-short stature syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- intrauterine growth retardation, metaphyseal dysplasia, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, genital anomalies, and immunodeficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P
- IMAGe syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Polymerase proofreading-related adenomatous polyposisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POLE | NM_006231.4 | c.155G>A | p.Arg52Gln | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 49 | ENST00000320574.10 | NP_006222.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POLE | ENST00000320574.10 | c.155G>A | p.Arg52Gln | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 49 | 1 | NM_006231.4 | ENSP00000322570.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152134Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000207 AC: 52AN: 251488 AF XY: 0.000199 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000431 AC: 63AN: 1461882Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000440 AC XY: 32AN XY: 727244 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152252Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74450 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge
not specified Uncertain:1
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12 Uncertain:1
This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868].
Carcinoma of colon Uncertain:1
The POLE p.Arg52Gln variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic and MutDB databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs372459649) “With Uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity, submitters: likely benign by Invitae and Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano and uncertain significance by GeneDx), Clinvitae (2x), and in control databases in 54 of 277204 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include Other in 1 of 6464 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 36 of 34418 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), European Non-Finnish in 3 of 126710 chromosomes (freq: 0.00002), Ashkenazi Jewish in 2 of 10150 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), and South Asian in 12 of 30782 chromosomes (freq: 0.0004) while not observed in the African, East Asian and European Finnish populations. The p.Arg52 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact of Gln at this position to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 2 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance.
POLE-related disorder Uncertain:1
The POLE c.155G>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Arg52Gln. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.10% of alleles in individuals of Latino descent in gnomAD. ClinVar lists conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity ranging from benign to a variant of uncertain significance (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/413598/). Although we suspect that this variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence.
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at