12-21801025-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2

The NM_020297.4(ABCC9):​c.*19T>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00163 in 1,613,438 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 39 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0085 ( 19 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00091 ( 20 hom. )

Consequence

ABCC9
NM_020297.4 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, single submitter B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.53
Variant links:
Genes affected
ABCC9 (HGNC:60): (ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 9) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the superfamily of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. ABC proteins transport various molecules across extra- and intra-cellular membranes. ABC genes are divided into seven distinct subfamilies (ABC1, MDR/TAP, MRP, ALD, OABP, GCN20, White). This protein is a member of the MRP subfamily which is involved in multi-drug resistance. This protein is thought to form ATP-sensitive potassium channels in cardiac, skeletal, and vascular and non-vascular smooth muscle. Protein structure suggests a role as the drug-binding channel-modulating subunit of the extra-pancreatic ATP-sensitive potassium channels. Mutations in this gene are associated with cardiomyopathy dilated type 1O. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.9).
BP6
Variant 12-21801025-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-21801025-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 379564.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars. Variant chr12-21801025-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr12-21801025-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00854 (1300/152312) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0299 (1243/41560). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0285. There are 19 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 606 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 19 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ABCC9NM_020297.4 linkc.*19T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 40 of 40 ENST00000261200.9 NP_064693.2 O60706-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ABCC9ENST00000261200.9 linkc.*19T>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 40 of 40 5 NM_020297.4 ENSP00000261200.4 O60706-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00852
AC:
1296
AN:
152194
Hom.:
19
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0299
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00255
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00621
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00226
AC:
567
AN:
250908
AF XY:
0.00154
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0311
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00119
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000106
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000910
AC:
1329
AN:
1461126
Hom.:
20
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000744
AC XY:
541
AN XY:
726872
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0310
AC:
1037
AN:
33462
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00150
AC:
67
AN:
44708
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26128
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39668
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000464
AC:
4
AN:
86198
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53100
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000174
AC:
1
AN:
5754
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000899
AC:
100
AN:
1111734
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00199
AC:
120
AN:
60374
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.491
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
67
134
201
268
335
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
34
68
102
136
170
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00854
AC:
1300
AN:
152312
Hom.:
19
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00814
AC XY:
606
AN XY:
74484
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0299
AC:
1243
AN:
41560
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00255
AC:
39
AN:
15292
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000735
AC:
5
AN:
68036
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00615
AC:
13
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
61
123
184
246
307
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00578
Hom.:
16
Bravo
AF:
0.00996
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 21, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.90
CADD
Benign
0.081
DANN
Benign
0.49
PhyloP100
-1.5
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs114906131; hg19: chr12-21953959; API