12-26428025-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PP3_Strong
The NM_002223.4(ITPR2):c.6833T>C(p.Leu2278Pro) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00015 in 1,613,226 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002223.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITPR2 | ENST00000381340.8 | c.6833T>C | p.Leu2278Pro | missense_variant | Exon 49 of 57 | 1 | NM_002223.4 | ENSP00000370744.3 | ||
ITPR2 | ENST00000451599.6 | n.*1352T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 12 of 18 | 1 | ENSP00000408287.2 | ||||
ITPR2 | ENST00000451599.6 | n.*1352T>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 12 of 18 | 1 | ENSP00000408287.2 | ||||
ITPR2 | ENST00000538984.1 | n.-88T>C | upstream_gene_variant | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152196Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000887 AC: 22AN: 248010Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000817 AC XY: 11AN XY: 134644
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000159 AC: 233AN: 1460912Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000155 AC XY: 113AN XY: 726764
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152314Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000806 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74476
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
The c.6833T>C (p.L2278P) alteration is located in exon 49 (coding exon 49) of the ITPR2 gene. This alteration results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 6833, causing the leucine (L) at amino acid position 2278 to be replaced by a proline (P). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at